Search for: "Klein v. Klein" Results 701 - 720 of 1,258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2020, 6:44 am by Magdaleen Jooste
  Trade marks The judgement of the IPAB in Eveready Industries India Ltd v. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 7:12 am by Cody M. Poplin
Alex Loomis walked us through the Department of Justice’s amicus brief in Weinstein v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 1:01 pm
Never mind, the US Supreme Court has already agonised over these issues in Eldred v Ashcroft and Golan v Holder so we can be comforted that they weren't a problem after all. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:31 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See also Motion Picture Patents Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
That was the situation presented in a recent court case: Thompson v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:27 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Mahler of Farrell Fritz in his New York Business Divorce Blog Ghameshlouy v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
" "In opposition, the plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that the Horn and Sager defendants committed malpractice by allegedly not calling the plaintiffs CPA as a witness, by advising him to enter into a modification of his March 12, 1999 child custody stipulation, or by failing to move to disqualify his former wife’s counsel (see generally Waggoner v Caruso, 14 NY3cl 874, 903 NYS2d 333 [2010]; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 648 NYS2d 871 [1996]). [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
Take this month’s decision of the Appellate Division, Second Department, in Middleton v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 9:59 am
Eckart Klein, Globalisation and International Law Andreas Kley, Das russische Reich im 19. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for the Washington Examiner, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton urges the court to review Klein v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 5:10 am
Ctr., 34 AD3d 441; Randolph v Cornell, 29 AD3d 557; Burke v Klein, 269 AD2d 348). [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 4:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action or would not have incurred any damages, but for the lawyer’s negligence” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; see Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 1009). [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Constitution Daily, Lyle Denniston explains why a cert petition the justices will consider at their conference today, Klein v. [read post]