Search for: "LEE V. STATE"
Results 701 - 720
of 4,612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2015, 7:11 am
" Carfax, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Pa. 1985) (can’t tell what state’s law); Seiden v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 3:17 am
10/14/09 Wisconsin Family Voice:Last week, Attorneys Michael Dean (First Freedoms Foundation) and Richard Esenberg, legal counsel for Wisconsin Family Action (WFA) President Julaine Appling, and WFA board members Jerry Hiller and Lee Webster filed with the State Supreme Court a brief that objects to Fair Wisconsin, represented by Lambda Legal; and five lesbian couples, represented by ACLU of WI, becoming intervenors ("third parties") in the lawsuit that WFA board members… [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:01 pm
So for that issue, absent anything new (like the Supreme Court stepping in and saying that its earlier dicta about the scope of state law in Viking River Cruises was correct), we pretty much know at this point how these things will go in both federal and state court.Judge Lee adds a concurrence that has little to do with the substance of the court's holding but that he nonetheless feels is important to add just so employers don't potentially get stuck with issue… [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 7:38 am
The image is of the Buck v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 1:39 pm
Lee Vail, P.E., Ph.D. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 3:48 am
Lee, 2009 WL 3762404 (W.D. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 12:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 5:47 pm
Ibrahim v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 8:24 am
United States was, as Evan Lee put it, “The Battle of the Canons,” the first argument in Torres v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 5:17 am
by Lee DavisUnited States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 8:20 am
Lee (government abused its authority when it withheld a third “acceptance of responsibility” point because the defendant had challenged errors in his presentence report); and United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:16 pm
In Thornton v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
The SEC’s Office of Economic Analysis’ 2009 Study on Section 404 states this point more explicitly: “Section 13(b)(2) of the Exchange Act requires companies to maintain effective ICFR, while Section 404 requires management to report on the effectiveness of ICFR. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:15 pm
The decision reaffirms the Maryland high court's 2003 decision in Oken v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:31 pm
Lee, Docket No. 15-446. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
United States, 13-127; Brewington v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 2:30 pm
” United States v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:31 am
Allied Interstate, No. 10-1089 or Mediostream v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 10:43 am
Lee and Emily Rong Zhang are attorneys with the Voting Rights Project of the American Civil Liberties Union, which filed amicus briefs supporting the challengers in Gill v. [read post]
