Search for: "Landmark Legal Foundation" Results 701 - 720 of 776
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2014, 9:57 am by JMBM Global Hospitality Group®
Better-than-expected results for 2013 will lay a solid foundation for continued growth and profitability over the next several years. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 4:04 am by Peter Mahler
In a post two years ago I described the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing as one of the least understood and most misused legal doctrines in the realm of shareholder and partnership disputes, inappropriately invoked by lawyers as often as not to allege breach of free-floating, fiduciary-like obligations untethered from the doctrine’s contractual foundation. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:57 am by JMBM Global Hospitality Group®
Better-than-expected results for 2013 will lay a solid foundation for continued growth and profitability over the next several years. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
A brief summary of the discussion of some landmark judgements delivered by the Supreme Court on the subject is given below. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 11:20 am
The authorities declared victory, of course:The sense of official momentum towards a landmark shift built on Thursday as Vice Premier Sun Chunlan, who oversees COVID efforts, told a meeting of frontline experts that the Omicron variant was weakening in its ability to cause disease, allowing China to improve prevention efforts. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
The press has described the measure as representing "a potential landmark effort to turn the tide on several long-term trends in U.S. competitiveness. [read post]
24 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
” This understanding of legal objectivity has its origins in what is, in fact, a gendered ordering of knowledge. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 5:55 am by Tom Dannenbaum
At what ought to be a landmark moment in its already impressive engagement with international law, Ukraine is on the verge of a significant unforced legal and political error. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm by Chris Attig
  With that foundation, we can finally discuss the significance of Procopio v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:21 am by Joe Mullin
In this episode, you’ll learn about: The prior art, or evidence, of earlier technology that EFF was able to present to courts to prove that the so-called “podcasting patent” was invalid How the landmark Alice v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
Pix Credit: “Climate justice must not stop at borders” NGOs tell ECHR in landmark case  Climate change litigation before regional human rights tribunals are now entering a critical evolutionary stage. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The concept of materiality has been called the “bedrock” or the “cornerstone” of the corporate disclosure system established by Congress in the federal securities laws.[1] But, despite its importance, determining how to use or apply the concept can be difficult. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am by admin
At its February 25 meeting, the Board will consider reversing its adoption of the protocol pending a legally required review of environmental impacts to forests and the climate. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 10:34 am by Amy Howe
The limits came through a legal theory known as the “major questions” doctrine, the idea that if Cong [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:21 am by Dennis Crouch
 Building upon the strong foundation of AIA reforms, on February 14, 2013, President Obama stated that “our efforts at patent reform only went about halfway to where we need to go. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
If popular sovereignty is to survive, it will require more than the commitment of an elite corps of legal scholars. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:44 am by Kevin Russell
Greenwood will it be AT&T II The Supreme Court, in the landmark decision AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
On October 30, 2023, the Biden Administration issued a landmark Executive Order nearly one year after publication of the Biden Administration’s AI Bill of Rights. [read post]
” Thus, it held the testimony amounted to non-expert opinion unsupported by a factual foundation, and therefore did not constitute substantial evidence. [read post]