Search for: "Latham" Results 701 - 720 of 2,529
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 2:15 am by Franco Galbo
An aroma that meets both of these requirements is eligible for registration on the Principal Register under §2(f) of the Latham Act, or on the Supplemental Register if the scent is nonfunctional but has not yet acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 9:21 am by Jennifer Davis
KF4244.M45 L38 1999 Latham, Peter S. and Patricia Latham. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 3:00 am by John Jenkins
This Latham memo addresses the key takeaways from the […] [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 1:20 am by Legal Week, staff
Other firms making hires include Squire Patton Boggs, Pinsent Masons and Addleshaw Goddard [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 6:03 am
Ferris, University of Missouri; Narayanan Jayaraman, Georgia Institute of Technology; and Stella Liao, Illinois State University, on Saturday, September 16, 2017 Tags: Board composition, Board performance, Boards of Directors, Corporate culture, Director compensation, Director nominations, Director qualifications, Diversity, Europe, Firm valuation, International governance, Management, Overboarding, Proxy… [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 7:49 am
Posted by Latham & Watkins LLP, on Sunday, September 17, 2017 Editor's Note: This post is based on a Latham & Watkins LLP publication by Latham partners Michael J. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm by Steve Bainbridge
It's a good summary of the background, the history of the personal benefit requirement, and the Second Circuit decision. [[ This is a content summary only. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:43 am by Eric Caligiuri
 As a result, Eolas argued Latham must be disqualified from representing Amazon because “Amazon’s defense is predicated on attacking [the ‘906 patent,] the very patent that Latham once competed to assert and later defended, and about which Latham has acquired substantial confidential and strategic information. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 9:43 am by Eric Caligiuri
 As a result, Eolas argued Latham must be disqualified from representing Amazon because “Amazon’s defense is predicated on attacking [the ‘906 patent,] the very patent that Latham once competed to assert and later defended, and about which Latham has acquired substantial confidential and strategic information. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 8:00 am by Dennis Crouch
They are as follows:[3] Rank Firm Percentage Female 1 Dykema Gossett 75% 2 Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan 57% 3 Arnold & Porter 35% 4 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 32.3% 5 Littler Mendelson 32.2% 6 Latham & Watkins 30.0% 7 Hogan Lovells 29.9% In the rarefied world of Supreme Court practice, having just one or two top female attorneys on the team can make the firm a leader in gender diversity. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 5:44 am by Joe Patrice
[New York Law Journal] * But don't forget about the transgender ban -- we've got a new lawsuit over that too, courtesy of Latham & Watkins. [read post]