Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 701 - 720
of 8,596
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2014, 6:17 am
Finding that an employer did not breach policy or union agreements by laying off a long-time African-American employee and keeping less senior but more versatile workers, and finding that the mere fact that workers retained in the layoff were in the employee’s same wage group was not enough to show they were similarly situated, an Eighth Circuit panel affirmed summary judgment on the employee’s race discrimination and retaliation claims under Sec. 1981 (Young v Builders… [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 11:17 am
The Judge in Loudon County mistakes the meaning and scope of Nelson v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 9:36 am
-Barnum & Bailey Combined Shows v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:41 am
Dupree v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 4:20 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 4:03 am
In Quality Environmental Processes, Inc. v I.P. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 1:10 pm
In today’s case (Ziemver v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 5:24 pm
Monster Cable Prods. and Monster Cable Int'l, Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:18 am
The split decision in Staub v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:04 am
In Ţîmpău v Romania [2023] ECHR 982, the applicant, Doina Ţîmpău, challenged her dismissal as a lay teacher of Orthodox religion in a public school. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 9:28 am
(See Cobbins v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 11:29 am
Kay v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 8:09 am
Carolyn Catchot v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:23 am
In The Hardison Law Firm, P.C. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 12:08 pm
Adam Levitin already posted on this week's decision in Cuomo v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
In this post, I want to lay out some of the possible Fourth Amendment rules that the Court might consider to answer that question. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 5:55 pm
Here is the abstract: This article examines the Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in Garcetti v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:45 am
Here lays Mr Mosley’s problem. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:54 am
By Mike Dorf Law students and many members of the lay public learn early on the Blackstonian maxim for every right, a remedy, invoked by Chief Justice John Marshall in the opening passages of Marbury v. [read post]
