Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 701 - 720
of 3,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
Lord Hoffman commented:"22. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:55 pm
On the Secretary of State’s application, the matter was reconsidered. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
She previously authored The Legal History of the Presidential Management Fellows Program and Hansberry v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 3:26 am
According to Lord Hughes (with whom Lord Neuberger, Lord Mance, Lord Sumption and Lord Hodge agree) [para 10],“It may readily be agreed that the expression “such a sign” in section 92(1)(b) refers back to the sign described in the immediately preceding paragraph (a). [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 7:34 am
As stated in North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760 he ‘is not an insurer against all hazards’. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 2:32 pm
L&Q -v- Ansell appears to state that, once the arrears and costs set out in the Possession Order have been paid, the occupier ceases to be a ‘tolerated trespasser’ in the sense of Burrows because their occupation is no longer subject to s.85 Housing Act 1985 - either in terms of execution of the order or possible application for variation of the order. [read post]
2 Apr 2011, 5:11 am
In T M Noten BV v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
Sales LJ was unconvinced that the criteria set out in Ladd v Marshall [1954] EWCA Civ 1 – intended to reflect the balance of justice in relation to applications to admit fresh evidence – had not been satisfied and KV was unable to demonstrate that evidence such as Dr Cohen’s report could not have been obtained with reasonable diligence for use earlier. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 4:08 am
The Louisiana Supreme Court, however, ruled on May 22 that the Supreme Court's 1977 decision barring capital punishment for rape (Coker v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:21 am
The appeal was heard and shall be considered by a five justice panel of Lords Phillips, Walker, Brown, Mance and Wilson. [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Lord Neuberger reviewed a long list of authorities of the House of Lords, the Privy Council and that of the Court of Appeal in Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovicky Budvar NP [1984] FSR 413, 462. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
A second opinion concluded that Y was in a vegetative state and that there was no prospect of improvement. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:00 am
Lord Neuberger stated therefore that the issue of whether the 1999 Act costs regime infringed the Convention “is open to this Court to reconsider”, but that “it would be wrong for this Court to decide the point without the Government having had the opportunity to address the Court on the issue”. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 5:06 pm
In English law the “conventional figures” are much higher than in, say, France but much lower than in the United States. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
In all other respects Flood upheld and applied the principles set out by the House of Lords in Reynolds v The Times and Jameel v Wall Street Journal. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 2:30 am
Mrs Braganza appealed to the Supreme Court, and the appeal was heard on 10 November 2014 by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr, Lord Wilson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:36 am
R (MD)(Afghanistan) v Secretary of State [2012] EWCA Civ 194 is an immigration case but merits wider attention because of what it has to say about the interplay between renewing a judicial review claim and appeals. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:36 am
R (MD)(Afghanistan) v Secretary of State [2012] EWCA Civ 194 is an immigration case but merits wider attention because of what it has to say about the interplay between renewing a judicial review claim and appeals. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 6:51 pm
Rainy Sky S.A. v. [read post]
