Search for: "MATTER OF ADOPTION OF A J R"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,716
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2016, 8:30 am
” “Denial of [registered trademark] benefits creates a serious disincentive to adopt a mark which the government may deem offensive or disparaging…. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 1:03 pm
Rather, it is a position introduced by one judge and then adopted by some others. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
In chapter two, political scientist J. [read post]
18 Sep 2016, 7:31 pm
The simple fact, in the case at bar, that the Policy can be said to have been adopted pursuant to s. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:09 pm
Cast Iron Soil Pipe Inst., 851 F.2d 478, 488 (1st Cir. 1988) (Breyer, J.))). [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 5:00 am
After a review of the matter before her along with the relevant legal authority in Pennsylvania and other jurisdictions, the court granted the carrier’s Motion to Dismiss. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
So Christopher did commit adultery.Did the timing matter for purposes of the recrimination defense? [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
Kleiner, Occupational Licensing, J. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:24 am
Dole Food Co., Inc., September 2, 2016, Fuentes, J.). [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF KENNETH E. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:28 am
Edwards, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Columbus, for Appellant Greater Dayton Regional Transit Authority Michael J. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
[I think this is a matter of leveraging reciprocity norms; Ramsey mentions guilt.] [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 7:42 am
But why does that analogy matter? [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 7:22 am
Nettles, August 3, 2016, Ross, J.). [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 7:05 am
., July 26, 2016, Weiner, J.). [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 1:30 pm
This means that the effective protection under the patent is insufficient to cover the investment in R&D (see Article 4 of the SPC Regulation). [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 9:44 am
To navigate these challenges, many government employers adopt an approach similar to that described in the previous section. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm
Relief in equity was not viewed as a matter of right but was deemed as subject to the discretion of the court. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 1:03 pm
Lindsay J. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 6:28 am
Sure, it’s a 1.8% increase, but it’s nowhere near the 8% increase we saw in 2014, the nearly 5% bump announced in 2008, or even the 3% or so increase adopted in 2011. [read post]
