Search for: "MATTER OF K A B" Results 701 - 720 of 2,719
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The [patent proprietors] argue that the invention only concerns as cast structures […], and hence the claimed subject-matter must also relate to such steel strip, whether or not it is explicitly defined. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
This approach is however inconsistent with the requirements of the claimed subject-matter: to obtain a set of properties in combination. [2.4] Other evidence, not invoked by the [patent proprietor], undermines the conclusions presented by the [patent proprietor] regarding appropriate conditions based on example 25, showing these not to be generally applicable. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The […] differences of the subject-matter of claim 1 over D1 allow maintaining player anonymity in the game transactions between the game outcome servers and the player management server. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A detergent composition comprising (a) 15 to 40% by weight of an anionic surfactant, (b) 0.5 to 5% by weight of a chlorine scavenger, (c) a protease whose ? [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Moreover, document D18, tables 11-13 describes that the a* and b*-value depend significantly on the paper and on the printer used. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
While clearly implicit in those legislative requirements, the caselaw adds that the grounds of appeal must be analysed vis-à-vis the reasons in the decision under appeal and must enable the board and the respondent to understand immediately why the decision is alleged to be incorrect: what the Board in its communication called the need for “argument or reasoning linking the matters set out in the statement of grounds with the reasons given by the OD in its decision”. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Consequently, only this feature is to be taken into account in examining inventive step of the claimed subject-matter. [1.8] For examining inventive step, the board follows the well-established “problem-and-solution approach”, according to which an invention is to be understood as a solution to a technical problem. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The board considers both issues rather to be a subsidiary matter in the present case. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 3:52 pm
    Case Documents:Filing Date Type File Summary 11/26/2020 Application Download Application to the European Court of Human Rights 03/25/2021 Order Download Court communication letter to the Swiss government (in English) 04/26/2021 Order Download Subject matter of the case and questions attached to the communication letter (in French) 07/16/2021… [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
If it is not and the statute provides the defendant with adequate notice and the police with clear criteria, that is the end of the matter. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 11:42 am by Rick Hills
Back in April, Linda Greenhouse warned liberals to "[b]eware of conservatives bearing gifts" -- in particular, the "gift" of "the discordant music of federalism" on marriage rights. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
”[2] The subject matter of decision G 1/09 was a divisional application filed after a decision refusing the parent application had been rendered, but before the appeal period had expired. [read post]
18 Sep 2010, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
R 104 is the implementing rule providing two additional fundamental procedural defects to wit, (a) the Board did not hold OPs despite a request to this end; or (b) it omitted to decide upon a request. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:05 pm by Armand Grinstajn
MSSA and MRSA which, according to the patent, were also important ophthalmic pathogens. [2.3] In point 3.4.1 of the decision under review, the Board assessed the inventive step of the claimed subject-matter using the problem-solution approach based on the facts referred to above. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:05 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It is another matter that Mercedes could possibly have required from VDO to keep the fact of the sale secret, in order to prevent the leaking of any information to its competitors about the technical parameters of its engines. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
According to the opponents, that case was similar to the present one. [11.9] The case law also mentions decision T 168/99 [1], in which it was decided that withdrawal of subject-matter (there, of the granted claims before the OD had commented on them) did not necessarily mean that it had formally been abandoned. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
As a consequence, the subject-matter of claim 4 is to be considered novel within the meaning of A 54.To download the whole decision (in German), click here.The file wrapper can be found here. [read post]