Search for: "MATTER OF R T" Results 701 - 720 of 53,431
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2007, 10:00 pm by arester
" Title: Mark Heyrman: "Why the Legal Standard for Involuntary Commitment to Mental Hospitals Doesn't Matter (Much)" Length: 56:11 minutes (51.45 MB) Format: MP3 Stereo 44kHz 128Kbps (CBR) Right [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Accordingly, reimbursement of the appeal fee under R 103(1)(a) is not justified. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 1:52 am by 1 Crown Office Row
R (T) v (1) Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, (2) Secretary of State for the Home Department (Secretary of State for Justice an interested party) [2012] EWHC 147 (Admin) – read judgment. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:06 am
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Carol Jean Chiarito, Claimant, v. [read post]
19 Nov 2022, 1:00 am by Rose Hughes
Furthermore, the burden of proof is placed on the Patentee to show that an unusual parameter relied on for novelty does actually distinguish the claimed subject-matter from the prior art (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, III-G, 5.2.2(d), T 0131/03, T 2732/16). [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 2:46 pm by Lisa A. Mazzie
April is National Poetry Month, which may be Marquette University President Scott R. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 5:29 am by Eugene Volokh
[Lawsuits are matters of public record -- and you generally can't hide them from prospective business partners, employers, house buyers, or others.] [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
It is the established case law of the Boards of Appeal (see G 3/08, T 258/03, and T 424/03) that claimed subject-matter specifying at least one feature not falling within the ambit of A 52(2) is not excluded from patentability by the provisions of A 52(2) and (3). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 10:08 pm by Carolyn Elefant
This week, Godin is offering a freebie: an ebook entitled What Matters Now. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:23 pm by Steve Bainbridge
By contrast, the limitations that come with proxy access are significant: the number of nominees a shareholder can propose is limited; the level of shareholder support required to gain a seat, as a practical matter, is increased; the company retains control over the design of the proxy cards; and the company retains exclusive access to preliminary voting information. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In accordance with R 115(2), the proceedings continued without him. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 9:10 pm by Buce
  I don't think anybody wants to listen to three hours of nice, no matter how goofy (full disclosure: I add my name to the list of those who find Huckabee likeable in manner if godsmacking in substance). [read post]