Search for: "Maine v. Superior Court"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,006
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2012, 7:07 am
Despite the fact that Merrimack later reversed itself and paid the claim, the New Jersey Superior Court found that Merrimack had acted in bad faith. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:30 pm
Last summer, in Espinoza v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 3:07 pm
Indeed, Eugene V. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
After all, forthcoming Supreme Court guidance seems unlikely given that the Court has not heard a juvenile interrogation case since Fare v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:00 am
After all, forthcoming Supreme Court guidance seems unlikely given that the Court has not heard a juvenile interrogation case since Fare v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 4:23 pm
On the consumer protection claims, defendants' main argument is that there can be no "market causation" theory of damages, as set forth in Oliveira v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 4:49 am
Superior Court, currently pending before the California Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 1:56 pm
Gross filed her lawsuit in 2008 in state superior court in Atlantic City. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:39 pm
In order to get to the Superior Court to address the consolidation versus severance issue, which is typically raised by way of preliminary objections, permission to appeal on an interlocutory basis must be secured by the litigants from the trial court. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 2:52 pm
One provision of the constitution directs that no more than a “bare majority” of the judges on the state’s five main courts can be affiliated with any one political party. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:00 pm
The main case illustrating the Government’s argument was O’Donoghue v Legal Aid Board where a delay in granting a legal aid certificate for 25 months was found to amount to a breach of the plaintiff’s constitutional right of access to court and to fair procedures so that she had a right to recover damages for demonstrated loss. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am
To be sure, the issue is not entirely settled because the Supreme Court, in Goldwater v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 5:42 pm
From Guerrero v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 10:31 am
The Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 10:31 am
The Supreme Court of Canada in R. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:37 am
Coffing Hoist Division, 528 A.2d 590 (Pa. 1987) – an exclusion later extended to compliance with mandatory government standards by the Superior Court (an appellate court in Pennsylvania) – and of a plaintiff’s comparative fault in Kimco Development Corp. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 8:57 am
Sobel v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 8:22 pm
As the Supreme Court famously stated in Armstrong v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 4:24 am
Put differently, "[a] fiduciary relation exists when confidence is reposed on one side and there is resulting superiority and influence on the other" (AG Capital Funding Partners, L.P. v State St. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
