Search for: "Manufacturing Company v. United States"
Results 701 - 720
of 3,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2007, 10:05 am
Cir. 2004) (271(f) “component” does not cover export of plans/instructions of patented item to be manufactured abroad); Bayer v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 11:03 am
Defendants hail from various areas of the world, including India, the United Arab Emirates, the British Virgin Islands, Israel, Ireland and the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 11:32 pm
To a complaint with the United States International Trade Commission (ITC). [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 12:14 pm
Not all structured settlements are life insurance products or manufactured by life insurance companies. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
UtiliCorp United Inc., 497 U. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 11:09 pm
Yesterday (Sunday), Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California determined that a new Apple v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 2:07 pm
James Landolt v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 11:35 pm
Ericsson mmWave trial: Apple dropped one of its three patents-in-suit right before trialFor the same day--yesterday--the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC) had scheduled the trial of Apple's countersuit against Ericsson. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am
Section 271(e)(1) of the Patent Act provides that: “It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention … solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am
Section 271(e)(1) of the Patent Act provides that: “It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention … solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:28 am
Section 271(e)(1) of the Patent Act provides that: “It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention … solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 1:51 pm
In late 2013, there was a massive settlement of criminal and civil cases between the manufacturer, the United States, and a number of states—including Georgia—resulting in, among other things, payment of millions of dollars to Georgia and a dismissal with prejudice of the Starr case. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:44 pm
Chakrabarty On June 16, 1980, 30 years ago today, the United States Supreme Court issued its landmark patentable subject matter decision in the case of Diamond v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 12:01 am
See The Ritz Hotel, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
Since 2013, Bossland has sold approximately 118,939 products in the United States alone. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 7:17 pm
Whenever an invention described in and covered by a patent of the United States is used or manufactured by or for the United States without license of the owner thereof or lawful right to use or manufacture the same, the owner’s remedy shall be by action against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims for the recovery of his reasonable and entire compensation for such use and… [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 12:02 am
Fun with fundamentals, US-styleRight: the seal of the United States Patent and Trademark OfficeThe IPKat, still behind with his Christmas reading, has at last had the chance to examine Fundamentals of United States Intellectual Property Law: Copyright, Patent, Trademark, the second edition of which was published by Kluwer Law International towards the close of 2006. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 5:54 am
& Loan Ass'n v. de la Cuesta, 458 U.S. 141, 153 (1982).When drug companies raise the preemption defense, they are saying that FDA regulations compel the manufacturer to do certain things -- give certain warnings, manufacture a drug a certain way, and so on -- and juries cannot require the manufacturer to act differently. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 11:15 am
On September 28, 2010, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in Schindler Elevator Corp. v. [read post]
