Search for: "Mark Pierce"
Results 701 - 714
of 714
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2007, 2:01 pm
The only way a coach can rest a star like Paul Pierce without incurring the Wrath of Stern is to put Pierce on the injury list. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 8:01 pm
That's a different issue than those involved in trademark or service mark infringement. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 3:10 pm
Pierce spoke about the challenges for SSP specifically and "structured settlement planning" (Pierce's term) stakeholders more generally in developing standards of professional conduct. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 2:29 pm
Grasping for an explanation, let's at least listen to what Pete Ruegger (Simpson's chair) had to say about vaulting to the $160,000 hash-mark: It was Good PR: "The perception that we're paying attention to compensation for associates will hopefully earn us goodwill," Getting a leg up in the competition for talent in law schools, and Aimed at retaining midlevel associates. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 12:37 am
Source: Legislative Retrieval System (LRS) Search Run on 2/26/2007
Categories Included: Corrections Law, Criminal Procedure Law, Judiciary Law, Penal Law. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 2:34 am
This is in marked contrast to the northern tip of the Antarctic Peninsula that is one of the most rapidly warming parts of the Earth. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 3:45 pm
Jordan Special Collections - Lorne Pierce, Canada Pamphlet 1970 no. 021, 3. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 10:13 am
As long as you are the first to use the mark in connection with your products, and no other person has filed an application to register the same or similar mark, you are generally entitled to exclusive use of that mark in the geographic area in which the mark has been used.Nonetheless, registering the mark at the U.S. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 9:13 am
But that protection will do you no good if a Plaintiff's lawyer is able to "pierce the corporate veil" of your company. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 10:35 am
This Christmas eve, I took 3 year old Mark on a little walk outside. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 6:41 am
Malcolm Langley, of the Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary, University of London, has informed the IPKat that the IP Mall at Pierce Law Center has digitised 250 historical treatises on IP, including the early editions of Copinger [on copyright], Terrell [on patents] and Kerly [on trade marks], which means that complete series are now available to readers. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 10:58 am
Shane Popp Article on Section 103 background [link] Mark Smith, a student at Santa Clara Law has these three posts in SCU’s great new Tech Law Forum: [www.techlawforum.net] [www.techlawforum.net] [www.techlawforum.net] The Patent at issue: [link] Cite as Dennis Crouch, “KSR Shifts Obviousness Debate to ‘Mere Aggregations,’ Patently-O, available at http://www.patentlyo.com. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 7:25 am
Brant dealt with so-called reverse piercing of a corporation. [read post]
24 Mar 2005, 5:04 pm
The runners-up were Christina Dallen, Mark Lovell, and Megan Dunham from the University of California - Hastings College of Law. [read post]
