Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 701 - 720
of 10,397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 4:16 am
D & P Holding S.A.. v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:42 pm
Mark J. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 10:34 pm
Without the question mark, that's Alaska's state motto.With the question mark, it's our title for a post analyzing the on-going trial in State of Alaska v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm
Especially in the western United States, sprawling homeless encampments have become ubiquitous, to the disgust and dismay of local residents. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:09 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 2:07 pm
" United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:19 am
Case date: 22 July 2022 Case number: No. 21-2786 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 10:21 am
The agencies claim that, as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Rapanos v. [read post]
CA3: Police were objectively reasonable in entering a house they thought was abandoned but it wasn't
8 Aug 2012, 4:28 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 8:00 am
United States, 130 U.S. 581 (1889), also known as the Chinese Exclusion Case. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:20 am
Any private entity that believes someone is using an expired or invalid patent can file a criminal lawsuit in the name of the United States, without getting approval from or even notifying the Department of Justice. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 1:00 pm
Here is the abstract: The United States Supreme Court in Sprint Communications Co LP v APCC Services Inc divided on the question whether an assignee for collection of federal debts satisfied Article III standing. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 12:23 pm
The Court stated the question thus: Does the Lanham Act allow the owner of a foreign mark that is not registered in the United States and further has never used the mark in United States commerce assert priority rights over the mark that is registered in the United States by another party and used in United States commerce? [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 2:28 pm
United States for discerning precedent from a plurality opinion. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 1:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
United States, marking the second time the Pennsylvania woman will appear before that tribunal. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]