Search for: "Marshall v. State" Results 701 - 720 of 4,417
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
The 1934 Supreme Court case of Home Building and Loan v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 3:42 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Georgia, an 1832 landmark case in which Chief Justice Marshall said that state law “can have no force” in Indian country. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:30 am
Little Rock as just an old solider calling on a friend for help one last time).But never in our history have we seen the disgrace of armed federal officers, US Marshals and others, invading a City in the United States of America against the wishes of the Governor of Oregon, and the Mayor of Portland. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:02 am by Will Baude
I realize that to most people it's not even the fifth-most-interesting case decided this week, but I was particularly surprised and pleased to see Chief Justice Roberts's concurrence on Monday in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 10:33 pm
Sharpe and Brown v. [read post]
21 Sep 2012, 1:12 pm by J. Adam Engel
An upcoming law review article highlights the “missed opportunity” presented by the Jones GPS tracking case:  It’s Raining Katz and Jones: The Implications of United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 9:00 am by Jason M. Knott
  The TSA then issued an order stating that the text message was sensitive security information (SSI). [read post]
22 May 2013, 8:24 am by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)Social media behemoth Facebook and an Oregon ad agency have been sued for copyright infringement [17 U.S.C. sec. 101 et seq.] in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan by the company that licenses and manages the music of 40-year-old rapper/songwriter Eminem (Marshall Bruce Mathers III).In the Complaint filed May 20, Eight Mile Style, LLC & Martin Affiliated LLC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 9:05 am by ernst
Why didn't Jefferson, Secretary of State Madison, or another executive official simply fire Marbury? [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 9:21 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says the plaintiff can sue these fellas under Section 1983.The case is Gleason v. [read post]