Search for: "Martin, Matter Of*#" Results 701 - 720 of 5,943
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2021, 1:05 pm by Emily Dai
Ambassador to Israel and Special Envoy for the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations Martin Indyk’s new book, “Master of the Game: Henry Kissinger and the Art of Middle East Diplomacy. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 9:20 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
So, according to the amendment proposed, the exclusions from protection via utility model would be limited to those exclusions envisaged for patents, plus process inventions and those which consist of biological matter. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 7:54 am by John Floyd
Martin Luther King, Malcolm X did not preach for human equality and racial justice. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 3:58 am by Matthias Weller
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 9:30 am by Whittel & Melton, LLC
No matter where you are this Thanksgiving weekend, please give yourself plenty of time to travel to your destinations safely. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Ryan Amelio
”[20] OSHA in the 1991 Standard relied on its reasoning from the 1978 Occupational Exposure to Lead Final Standard (the “1978 Standard”) where it rejected biological testing of workers as a means of monitoring employer compliance with occupational lead exposure limits.[21] In the 1978 Standard, OSHA concluded that “[a]ttempting to compel workers to subject themselves to detailed medical examinations presents the possibility of clashes with legitimate privacy and religious… [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm by Andrew Henderson
More than 20 years ago, Martin Seligman and his colleagues explained why lawyers are unhappy. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 8:08 am by Daniela Ampollini (Trevisan & Cuonzo)
 And subsequently, at the end of the oral proceedings that took place over three days from 19-21 October 2021, the Opposition Division maintained the patent as granted by rejecting all grounds of invalidity raised by the nine opponents, including added subject matter, novelty, inventive step and sufficiency of disclosure (appeals pending). [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 3:47 am by SHG
As day follows night, pundits masquerading as news reporters hook up with hitherto unknown law profs whose passionate theories mattered to no one whenever a high-profile case doesn’t go the way they believe it should. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
But if the court really wants to keep the plaintiff's identity secret, then the witness would have to be put under some sort of protective order to remain quiet about that identity as well.[8] Many people are likely to resist becoming witnesses if that means agreeing to a protective order, at least if they have no personal stake in the matter. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Writing for the annual Journalism Matters campaign, she said the Bill’s purpose is to protect free speech online while forcing social media platforms to police their sites properly. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 3:30 am by Gina-Gail Fletcher
Cary Martin Shelby, Profiting from Our Pain: Privileged Access to Social Impact Investing, 109 Cal. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:26 am by David Kopel
In general, Americans did not seem to mind people coming armed to attend or participate in legislative matters. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:11 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
Besides, there is no basis anywhere in Art. 116 or Art. 113 EPC that would support a distinction between first instance and appeal proceedings, and the ECHR should apply to all EPO proceedings as a matter of course. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:11 am by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
Besides, there is no basis anywhere in Art. 116 or Art. 113 EPC that would support a distinction between first instance and appeal proceedings, and the ECHR should apply to all EPO proceedings as a matter of course. [read post]