Search for: "Matter of Adoption of Doe" Results 701 - 720 of 19,638
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2007, 5:15 am
First adopted in 1937, the rule permits brokers to vote uninstructed shares, but not for controversial matters. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
Dec. 21, 2016), the court, in a matter of first impression, ruled that the physician–patient privilege does not protect from disclosure anonymous, third-party medical records. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 8:00 am by Todd Presnell
Dec. 21, 2016), the court, in a matter of first impression, ruled that the physician–patient privilege does not protect from disclosure anonymous, third-party medical records. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 9:27 am
At Wakenight & Associates, P.C., we have years of experience handling complex family law matters, including paternity and parentage cases. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 4:57 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
North Carolina does not allow third parties to seek custody or visitation unless certain conditions are met. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 12:15 am
  As an initial matter, the CSL defines the terms "sale" and "sell" to include any change in the rights, preferences, privileges, or restrictions of or on outstanding securities. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
After the hearing, an Assistant Deputy Commissioner (ADC) recommended a penalty of dismissal, which the Commissioner adopted. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
After the hearing, an Assistant Deputy Commissioner (ADC) recommended a penalty of dismissal, which the Commissioner adopted. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 9:00 am by Mai El-Sadany
(If a permanent member abstains instead, the resolution can still be adopted.) [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:59 am by Aurel Sari
Matters would be different if Turkey’s territory were subject to an armed attack from within Syrian territory or if Turkish forces, vessels or aircraft were attacked in or over the Mediterranean Sea. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
If Title VI requires colleges and universities to adopt the audience perspective, then that settles the matter. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 11:16 am by Tana Fye
”[13]  Because the twins fit into these portions of ICWA, the issues for determination by the Court were whether the state law definition of “domicile” should control, and whether under the ICWA definition of “domicile” the twins were non-domiciliaries on the reservation.[14]  The Supreme Court recognized that the language of ICWA does not define “domicile;” and that the definition is a matter of Congressional intent.[15] … [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Three and a half years ago, in Does It Make Tax Cents? [read post]
6 May 2023, 1:03 am by INFORRM
The Judgment may not however entirely have put the matter to bed, since it does not contain a clear statement on what may constitute “non-material damage” for the purposes of Article 82(1). [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:00 am by Peter Vodola
  Nowhere in the Osprey opinion does the Court adopt the Defendants' proposed definition of the civil offense of barratry. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm by Matthew Hill
There is one final point – does any of this actually matter? [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:11 am
This is because: "there is scope under EU law for member states to adopt a fair use doctrine as a matter of national law, and [the InfoSoc Directive] does not necessarily preclude it (not least because, in our view, [the InfoSoc Directive] has not harmonized the adaptation right [this is also the reason why the Report does not see any obstacles to the adoption of an "innovation exception"]). [read post]