Search for: "Matter of Clark v Clark" Results 701 - 720 of 1,912
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
Cummins is the managing partner of the Clarks Summit law firm of Cummins Law, a civil litigation practice. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 1:10 pm by L. Gopika
Five days ago, the UK Supreme Court pronouced its ruling on Public Relations Consultants Association Limited v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 3:17 am by Alasdhair McDonald, Olswang LLP
Comments  The case clarifies the lack of availability of the illegality defence in matters which do not engage the public interest and are essentially matters for resolution under private law. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 12:11 am
This shows just how fast the court system can be when there is a need for speed.Dsclmr - I used to have the pleasure of working with Arty Rajendra and Nick Kempton (now both at Osborne Clarke) who acted for LNDR together with Charlotte Groom also at Osborne Clarke and Douglas Campbell QC and Georgina Messenger of Three New Square. [read post]
20 Oct 2018, 6:07 am by Anushka Limaye
Victoria Clark posted their joint statement. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 8:31 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
On Thursday 29 March 2012 is Smegh (Ile Maurice) Ltée v Dharmendra Persad, an employment matter where it is for the Judicial Committee to decide whether sufficient weight was given to contradictions in an employee’s evidence in an unfair dismissal hearing. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Because the Kentucky Supreme Court invalidated the Clark-Kindred arbitration agreement in this nursing home matter, based exclusively on the clear-statement rule, the court must now enforce that agreement. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:06 am by Colin Miller
Exhibit A of this phenomenon in Tuerkheimer‘s article is the initial Sixth Circuit opinion in Gagne v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 6:03 am by admin
Supreme Court’s opinion here:U.S. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2008, 10:56 pm
  The court noted that a 1995 Court of Appeals decision held that  requiring off-site improvements was subject to Nollan/Dolan scrutiny, see Clark v. [read post]