Search for: "Matter of Greenfield"
Results 701 - 720
of 855
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
Scott Greenfield asked why he would make those statements. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 1:51 am
For consequential matters of reputation it sure matters. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Scott Greenfield is skeptical of some who wear that title. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 4:01 am
And the number of 5-4 decisions from the Court indicates just how broad and stark these divisions are.What they teach you in law school is that the rules matter and the precedents matter not basically for their own sake but because that's how the law works. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
While skimming through my RSS feed this morning, I ran across Scott Greenfield's post called "This (pointing) Is A Book". [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 8:57 am
At Simple Justice, Scott Greenfield took the case of ill-considered Kristine Peshek's ill-considered blawg as an opportunity to talk about a lawyer's duty of confidentiality to the client and the dangers of foolish blawggery. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 5:40 am
The list isn't exactly bad, or wrong for that matter, though there are some nits to pick. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 1:02 am
Freidman, a partner of Greenfield, Stein & Senior, discuss the importance of the distinction between relationships deemed confidential as a matter of law and those which must be established confidential at trial, a difference a recent Appellate Division panel found so pivotal that it set aside a verdict because of an incorrect jury charge, even though the charge was not objected to. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 9:04 pm
Dire lesson for lawyers in how not to do social media marketing [Mark Bennett/Defending People, Scott Greenfield, Patrick at Popehat, Carolyn Elefant/Legal Blog Watch] Tab-divider scam? [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 10:49 pm
(I blame Greenfield for my attempted prank; he recently reminded me how fun phone conversations can be.) [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 2:09 am
And it should matter to the rest of us. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 4:53 am
Even among good lawyers, not every one is right for every client or every case.But it matters who you have. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 2:50 am
You only make matters worse.And the Seattle Trademark Lawyer hosts Blawg Review #225 from an unlikely spot: The Pikes Place Market in, where else, Seattle. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:15 am
Local officials say the matter is under review. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 9:05 am
No matter who they are, or what they have done, they deserve to be treated fairly and with respect. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 5:05 pm
This week, filling in for our scheduled host are Ed. and Colin Samuels in this post, and Scott Greenfield at Simple Justice adding his own brand of Blawg Review: Sphincter Rules.Ainsley Brown at Law Is Cool reminds us that August 1 was a day of remembrance.Vickie Pynchon wrote a post discussing the cop, the president, the professor and civil harassment mediation, and followed up this teachable moment with another good post.Patrick at Popehat has some thoughts about the Bartender in Chief,… [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 8:11 pm
In a second post Scott Greenfield clears up some misconceptions about the charge circulating in the non-lawyer community. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 10:33 pm
For example, I discovered an interesting legal argument for a downward departure in a sentencing memo by researching Scott Greenfield cases on PACER in a recent mail fraud case. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 7:15 pm
It helps that the handful of other lawyer-writers we respect--like Scott Greenfield, the white collar defense lawyer in NYC who writes Simple Justice--have such a high regard for Bennett. [read post]
