Search for: "Matter of Snyder" Results 701 - 720 of 806
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Hoffman is not, by any account, a public figure in the town in which he and Collins live, and the communications related to matters that are not of public concern. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 6:01 am by Eugene Volokh
A tenured undergraduate faculty member has been fired for that, with the school faulting him not just for quoting "nigger" (from a leading precedent that had quoted the word 19 times)—I'm sure all adjuncts know now how unsafe that would be—but also "fag" from Snyder v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 8:08 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: Snyder v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
It also doesn’t really matter which clerk writes the opinion because nearly Every Justice who uses footnotes uses them in almost ever case. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 8:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter. [read post]
26 May 2020, 1:06 pm by Randye Snyder and Regan Canfill
The Department of Labor (the “DOL”), the Treasury Department (the “Treasury”), and the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”)  have recently issued guidance extending certain deadlines and providing certain relief for retirement plans in response to the current COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
For a long history that will never achieve popularity, what matters most are the opinions of those few who know. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 4:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
July 27, 2015) Interesting TM/copyright case that straddles the boundaries of so-called aesthetic and “utilitarian” functionality: is the accuracy of a replica product a matter of utilitarian or aesthetic functionality? [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 12:17 pm by Guest Blogger
Stephen Macedo             The Constitution’s deepest commitment – to securing equal freedom for all – argues for extending marriage to same sex couples and for preserving monogamy’s favored place in law. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 1:50 pm by Bexis
Sibley Memorial Hospital, 403 A.2d 1130, 1133 (D.C. 1979) (strict liability “would mean that the hospital, no matter how careful, would be held responsible, virtually as an insurer, if the patient were harmed”); Iacangelo v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:25 am by Sionaidh Douglas-Scott
But supporting the First Amendment sometimes requires difficult decisions, such as Snyder v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Lynn said that they, as lawyers, are comfortable with that type of analysis, because words matter. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
While Sun is not limited to the "precise" arguments raised below, she made no mention of the First Amendment or Snyder v. [read post]