Search for: "Mays v. Department of Air Force"
Results 701 - 720
of 852
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2010, 9:00 am
" Campo v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:28 am
" In DGR Associates, Inc., the Air Force based its position on a memorandum issued by the Department of Justice, which concluded that the Small Business Act did not require HUBZone prioritization. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
” (10) For example, they may require only signatures, or they enter into force for all original parties when a minimum number of States ratify the modification or unless a minimum number of States object within a certain time frame, or goes into force for all except those that object. (11) Depending on the treaty itself, once basic consensus is reached, it is not necessary for all to consent to certain modifications for them to go into effect. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:13 am
But, for common man, I don’t think that the Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism (ADR) is really effective and it is more so when a common man forced to submit himself to the Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 6:51 am
Patel Engineering Ltd. and Another (2006 AIR (SC) 450: 2005 (3) ArbLR 285: 2005 (8) SCC 618: 2005 (9) Scale 1: 2005 (9) JT 219: 2005 (7) Supreme 610: 2005 (7) SCJ 461: 2005 (5) CTC 302). [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 6:07 am
On July 21, 2010, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held in Borough of Ellwood City v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:35 pm
In 2004, in a case called Connecticut v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:06 am
But the Air Force investigation into his sexuality continued. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 1:05 pm
FAA Task Force on Air Carrier Safety and Pilot Training. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Department of Justice and the South Coast Air Quality Management District announced that Lifoam Industries, Inc. will pay $450,000 in fines, claiming the company violated the federal Clean Air Act and state air quality laws at its polystyrene manufacturing facility at 2340 E. 52 Street in Vernon, Calif. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
– Trading Markets.com, July 21, 2010 Consistent with Section 122 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(d), and 28 CFR 50.7, notice is hereby given that on July 16, 2010, the United States lodged a Consent Decree with 163 defendants (each of which is identified in the proposed Decree) in United States of America v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
While it was true that the speed had meant that some of the Defendants had been unable to obtain publicly funded representation, all the issues had been sufficiently aired by the six barristers who were retained in the matter and so no significant disadvantage was caused to those Defendants who were forced to represent themselves. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm
While it was true that the speed had meant that some of the Defendants had been unable to obtain publicly funded representation, all the issues had been sufficiently aired by the six barristers who were retained in the matter and so no significant disadvantage was caused to those Defendants who were forced to represent themselves. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
Defendant filed written notice of appeal on 27 May 2009. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Justice Department and the states of Alabama and Iowa announced July 14. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:38 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is Grosz v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 11:41 am
Prawfs readers may recognize Profs. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:29 am
During the 2004 and 2005 Air? [read post]
