Search for: "Mays v. Social Security Administration" Results 701 - 720 of 2,530
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2015, 9:45 am by Eric Goldman
Moreover, the testimony irrefutably establishes both presiding judges perceived the campaign as a threat to their personal security and as an attempt to intimidate and harass them into ruling as the petitioners wanted. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:42 pm
After searching for a job in California and North Carolina, having already exhausted her unemployment benefits, retirement savings and 401(k) account, Keaney decided to elect to receive social security early at the minimum required age of 62 years old. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 12:26 am
FITCHPATRICK has been determined by the federal government, Social Security Administration to be disabled and unable to engage in substantial work activity and currently draws the sum of $1202.00 per month less $66.60 for Medicare Premiums for a net of $1135.00 per month SSDI benefits for her disability.10. [read post]
30 May 2012, 12:19 pm by Deirdre Wheatley-Liss
 The mother applied for social security for the twins, and the issue came up of if the children are "children" for the purposes of social security. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:13 am by Tim Springer
” The Social Security Administration will not accept a doctor’s conclusory statement regarding disability. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am by Gordon Ahl
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
11 Feb 2021, 12:11 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the implications of the Texas v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:14 pm by M. Scott Koller
  Second, HD Life failed to address or even acknowledge the Social Security Administration’s determination that Sterio was permanently disabled. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:52 pm by Scott Koller
  Second, HD Life failed to address or even acknowledge the Social Security Administration’s determination that Sterio was permanently disabled. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Respondents appeal.Initially, petitioners move to strike a footnote from respondents' reply brief on the ground that it contains matters that are outside the scope of the administrative record. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Respondents appeal.Initially, petitioners move to strike a footnote from respondents' reply brief on the ground that it contains matters that are outside the scope of the administrative record. [read post]
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that time spent by construction workers going through security screening on their way to the work site inside an airport was not compensable under the FLSA in large part because the screening was required by the Federal Aviation Administration, and the employer “did not primarily — or even particularly — benefit from the [FAA-required] security regime. [read post]
3 Nov 2018, 11:10 am by Anushka Limaye
Robert Chesney provided an in-depth analysis of the legal and policy lessons learned from Doe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:45 pm by Katelynn Catalano
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) can require companies to disclose information about their climate, environmental, social, and governance risks and practices. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by William Ford
Robert Chesney dissected the most important disputes in Doe v. [read post]