Search for: "Mays v. State of Texas et al"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,045
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2021, 3:59 pm
(Law professor Helen Alvaré et al. note that women’s representation in professional fields, as in public service, has increased at the same time as a prolonged decline in the U.S. abortion rate.) [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
Johnson & Johnson, et. al. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 8:45 am
Italian Colors Restaurant, et al., No. 12-133 (argued February 27, 2013) and 3) offers of judgment under FRCP Rule 68 in Fair Labor Standards Act collective actions and the effect on FRCP Rule 23 class actions (Genesis Healthcare Corp. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Cooper, et al. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:25 pm
In Anheuser-Busch Companies, LLC, et al v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 12:18 pm
Grabbagreen Franchising LLC, et al., No. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 5:25 am
It is styled, Hector Chapa, et al v. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 9:35 am
(By Supreme Court rule, any party other than the petitioner is deemed a respondent before the Court, so IMLA et al. are technically respondents supporting petitioners.) [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
By the way, the social-science evidence that there are compelling educational benefits that outweigh the costs is underwhelming, as discussed in the amicus briefs filed in Fisher by Abigail Thernstrom et al., Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor, Jr., Gail Heriot et al., the Pacific Legal Foundation et al., (including my organization), and a group of economics and statistics scholars. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:03 pm
ECORE International, et al (Patents Post Grant Blog) BPAI expands the reach of Agilent doctrine in Ex Parte Smart: Agilent Technologies v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
(Business IP and Intangible Asset Blog) US Patents – Decisions Split Federal Circuit panel finds preamble language not limiting: Marrin v Griffin (GRAY on Claims) (Inventive Step) District Court E D Texas: Inequitable conduct expert could not testify as to materiality absent qualification as a person skilled in the art: Advanced Technology Incubator, Inc v Sharp Corporation et al (Docket Report) District Court N D California: Intracompany… [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 9:47 am
Swisa et al. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 3:20 am
" PROSECUTOR V. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 11:42 am
Fessinger, Melanie B., et al. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am
Mountain States/Rosen L.L.C. [read post]
8 Apr 2018, 3:44 pm
Volt Electrical Systems, LLC, et al., C.A. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 2:47 pm
Coronado, et. al. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 1:53 pm
(EDTX 2017) (patent infringement) and a $2,600,000 verdict in DPX Gear v Prince et al. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 11:52 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in Cason-Merenda, et al. v. [read post]
