Search for: "Meanes v. State" Results 701 - 720 of 69,268
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2018, 7:15 am by MICHAEL ETIENNE, MATRIX
Judgment in the case of R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32 is here. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 8:01 am
Expert testimony on whether lobbyist had pending "business" with a government agency at the time government official accepted travel for a golfing trip to Scotland was not harmless requiring reversal, in United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:19 pm by David Kopel
Another amicus brief in the case address the contemporary legal meaning of the words and phrases in the Recess Appointments Clause. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:37 am by sally
Vicoplus SC PUH v v Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid; BAM Vermeer Contracting sp. zoo v Same; Olbek Industrial Services sp. zoo v Same (Case C-307/09 to C-309/09); [2011] WLR (D) 46 “Articles 56FEU and 57FEU of the FEU Treaty did not preclude a member state from making the hiring out on its territory of workers who were Polish nationals subject to the obtaining of a work permit during the transitional period provided for in paragraph 2… [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 10:55 pm by Administrator
  The case is now formally known as Kristin Perry, et al v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm by Patent Arcade Staff
Morris Mohawk Gaming GroupUnited States District Court for D. [read post]
29 Aug 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
United States employs in determining whether the acts of a former President are immune from prosecution. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 10:51 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
The circuit court denied the first motion because Jones refused to turn over the results of private DNA testing that his attorney commissioned before trial, meaning Jones failed to satisfy [...] [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 4:20 am by Margaret Drew
This week, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its opinion in Elonis v. [read post]