Search for: "Miller, in the Matter of"
Results 701 - 720
of 5,111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2022, 7:33 am
At some point, breadth might matter. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 3:58 am
Tariff and Duty Risks on Products from China Keep Rising In Importing From China (Directly OR Indirectly) has Big RETROACTIVE Risks, one of our international trade lawyers (who was at the time working on a massive case involving illegal transshipment that eventually led to a U.S. company having to pay the U.S. government $62.5 million, from which our clients got a good chunk), warned about the duty risks on China products: If you are importing product originally from China covered by or even… [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 2:55 pm
In an opinion filed on December 16, 2021, and belatedly ordered published on January 13, 2022, the Fourth District Court of Appeal rejected a CEQA challenge to a small multifamily project in the City of Santa Cruz. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 8:01 am
What Is AI and Why Does It Matter for National Security? [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 12:54 pm
McCulloch & Miller does NOT handle guardianship matters, we are a guardianship avoidance firm. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 7:29 am
The latest edition features Chris Miller, an Associate Professor at the Fletcher School at Tufts. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 9:13 am
In an opinion filed January 28, and later certified for publication on February 16, 2022, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment denying a petition for writ of mandate that challenged on CEQA grounds the El Dorado Irrigation District’s (“EID”) decision to undertake its Upper Main Ditch piping project. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm
There were third party witnesses, which matters not only because Miller could not recall the details of the assault but also because people routinely apply the “he said, she said” trope when the eyewitness to the crime is a victim and the crime is gender violence. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:07 am
’ ‘’So Heck Miller left the newspaper business for Harvard Law School, then wound up at the U.S. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 2:15 pm
This dedication to strong client relationships is evidenced throughout the firm’s marketing messages, but particularly in the tagline, “Kean Miller, Your Counsel. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 11:28 am
(While mostly addressing CEQA issues, the lengthy opinion also contains extensive analysis of the required findings and policies of the Timberland Productivity Act (TPA) that are relevant to “immediate rezonings,” such as the County adopted here, but detailed discussion of that area is beyond this blog’s subject matter.) [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 10:49 am
Louisiana, 577 U.S. 190 (2016) (applying Miller retroactively). [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
We decline to review the procedural or due process issues raised because we dispose of the matter on other grounds.} [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 11:48 am
Nor did the paper – so quick to put two and two together where Andrew was concerned – draw what must appear the equally obvious conclusion from its own payment of ‘hush money’ to Sienna Miller (and to others, for that matter). [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 10:04 am
From complex international transactions to global privacy compliance, she routinely advises clients on matters related to cross-border transactions, contract negotiation and entity formation. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 7:58 am
One of the chapters will be on "Christianity and Equity," and my colleague Paul Miller and are writing it. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm
Miller, signed yesterday by Judge James Patrick Hanlon (S.D. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 8:35 am
Bud Light is made with “100% less corn syrup than Miller Lite. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 5:52 am
But the Supreme Court said that is wrong: To equate the number of forfeitures with the number of contracts would in a case such as this result almost always in but a single forfeiture, no matter how many fraudulent acts the subcontractor might have committed. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 10:29 am
In an opinion filed on December 29, 2021, and later ordered published on January 25, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal (Div. 4) affirmed a judgment upholding the City of Newark’s (City) use of Government Code § 65457’s CEQA exemption for a 469-lot residential subdivision on land adjacent to San Francisco Bay. [read post]
