Search for: "Modified Opinion filed 3/1/10"
Results 701 - 720
of 733
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2008, 7:51 am
This court's view could potentially open the floodgates for government searches capable of accessing all kinds of computer data; nothing noted in the opinion limits the scope of the government's search. [39] International travelers should not have to take magnets to their hard drives to ensure their privacy and legal safety. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 2:55 am
See Proposed Rule 1-3. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 1:50 pm
Blackstock, No. 05-7709 Dismissal of motion under 28 U.S.C. section 2255 as successive is vacated where: 1) the district court recharacterized a previous motion filed by defendant as a section 2255 motion without giving him the notice required by US v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 10:15 am
– Lowe’s, Inc.) 155 Cal.App.4th 1214 (filed 10/2/07, modified 10/31/07).Unfortunately for Lowe’s, they won the battle but lost the war because the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration approved by the City of Sonora did not include an evaluation of the road and intersection improvements required as a condition of project approval. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 10:15 am
– Lowe’s, Inc.) 155 Cal.App.4th 1214 (filed 10/2/07, modified 10/31/07). [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
Lalonde challenges his conviction on the grounds of alleged violations of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 10 and 11. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:38 am
Yet Terri waited approximately two months after DCS filed the CHINS petitions before initiating any action to modify the parenting time. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
Third, the FDA does not have to originate preemptive requirements to impose them, since the Agency can (and often does) tell manufacturers to modify their submitted designs, labels, or manufacturing processes. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 7:11 am
In compliance with that order, the protocol has been filed with the court under seal. 3 minor changes. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
NLRB Law Memo 10/13/2007 by LawMemo - World's Best. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
Charge filed by Professional Employees Local 2001; complaint alleged violations of Section 8(a)(5) and (1). [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 10:57 am
(For a discussion of the general plan consistency portion of the opinion see “Flexible General Plan Leads to Flexible Consistency”.) [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 7:30 pm
Id. at 2-3. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:10 am
Crouch, 201 S.W.3d 463, 465 (Ky.2006)("[T]rial court had no jurisdiction to modify the [permanent custody] order unless a motion to modify, along with a supporting affidavit, was filed in the case. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 12:40 am
"This Court made suggestions regarding how the procedures could be modified so as to comportwith the requirements of the Eighth Amendment and gave specific examples regarding itsconcerns. 1 3. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 6:06 pm
Charge filed by the Steelworkers; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (3). [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
This is a successive motion filed under Rule3.851(c)(2). [read post]
10 Aug 2007, 3:03 pm
NLRB Law Memo 08/10/2007 by LawMemo - World's Best. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
Lexis 667, at *9-10. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 5:49 am
Id., at 2-3. [read post]
