Search for: "Morris, Inc." Results 701 - 720 of 1,604
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2012, 7:00 am by Rebecca Anderson
He is president of George Weiss Associates, Inc., a New York-based money management firm. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:54 am by Bexis
Dec. 8, 2011) (express and implied warranty); Morris v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am by Joe Consumer
Chamber of Commerce 2008) and punitive damages have been perceived as so problematical as to lead the Supreme Court to impose constitutional limits, using controversial substantive due process principles, as well as federal statutory limits (BMW of North America, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:27 am by Joe Consumer
Chamber of Commerce 2008) and punitive damages have been perceived as so problematical as to lead the Supreme Court to impose constitutional limits, using controversial substantive due process principles, as well as federal statutory limits (BMW of North America, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm by Law Lady
EXPEDIA, INC.; ORBITZ, LLC; INTERNETWORK PUBLISHING CORP., d/b/a Lodging.com; TRAVELOCITY.COM, LLP; PRICELINE.COM, INC.; TRAVELWEB LLC, HOTWIRE, INC.; HOTELS.COM, L. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:46 pm by Victor Li
Pentair, Inc., announced Wednesday that it has agreed to acquire Tyco Flow Control, a subsidiary of Tyco International Ltd., in an all-stock "reverse Morris Trust" transaction valued at $10 billion. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
., Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm by Law Lady
PHILLIP MORRIS COMPANIES, INC., ET AL., Respondents. 3rd District.Attorney's fees -- Prevailing party -- Error to fail to award attorney's fees to defendant for fees it incurred defending plaintiff's motion to vacate arbitration panel's award where agreement between the two parties stated that attorney's fees would be borne solely by plaintiff if defendant prevailed in defense of an action brought by plaintiff -- Argument that defendant was not entitled to… [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:10 pm by Lori Bauman
Philip Morris USA, Inc., 344 Or 403 (2008), for the rule that the threat of future harm -- in the form of potential identity theft -- is not sufficient as an allegation of damages to support a negligence claim. [read post]