Search for: "ONLY A MILE v STATE"
Results 701 - 720
of 2,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2011, 7:25 am
As the Supreme Court said in Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 2:33 am
Robinson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 9:51 am
“Act 620 would shutter every clinic in Louisiana but one, leaving only one doctor to care for every woman seeking an abortion in the state. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:25 am
” Under UNCLOS, islands are entitled to a 200-nautical-mile exclusive economic zone and a continental shelf, whereas rocks only provide a twelve-nautical-mile territorial limit. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:31 am
United States Forest Service, 390 F. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 3:24 pm
In Town of Barnstable, Massachusetts v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:05 pm
A ruling in Oklahoma v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:38 pm
” Judge Legg reported last week on Dinnena v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:24 pm
A mile long.Lots of that I like. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 6:54 am
City of Richfield, v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 1:38 pm
After some back-and-forth, the District finally insisted that it would only approve his permit application if he would agree to the condition that would require him to improve off-site public property miles away—a monetary exaction. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 9:04 am
Terry v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 12:33 pm
The traffic stop occurred several miles from and 90 minutes after the crash. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 4:07 pm
[Quoting Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 4:07 pm
[Quoting Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:46 pm
ESN v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:07 pm
Already pending at the Court is an appeal by Mississippi state officials (Currier v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Enbridge argues that the U.S federal body—the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)—is the only body with the legislative authority to impose safety regulations in this matter.[3] Michigan has responded, arguing it has jurisdiction and that Line 5 is a matter for its own state courts. [read post]
