Search for: "Palmes v. Palmes"
Results 701 - 720
of 2,581
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2016, 9:57 am
Serving Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach counties. [read post]
15 May 2016, 4:24 am
Serving Broward, Miami-Dade and Palm Beach counties. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 8:39 am
Now serving Orlando, West Palm Beach, Port St. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 10:33 am
Now serving Orlando, West Palm Beach, Port St. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 3:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 1:07 pm
Additional Resources: Piltch v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:51 pm
Now serving Orlando, West Palm Beach, Port St. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
Now serving Orlando, West Palm Beach, Port St. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
Now serving Orlando, West Palm Beach, Port St. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
In State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2016, 11:49 am
Now serving Orlando, West Palm Beach, Port St. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:59 am
Smith v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:00 am
TweetLevin v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
Florida Dept. of Families and Children v. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 1:50 pm
On the other hand, with respect to the particular defendants here (the proprietors of "Hempies" in Palm Desert), the Court of Appeal reverses the dismissal of the charges against 'em and confirms that dispensaries can't be "primary caregivers" under the Compassionate Use Act (though they may be permissible "collectives").So check it out if you're a big medical marijuana person.It's also an informative opinion for those of us sitting on the… [read post]
11 May 2024, 7:42 am
King v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 12:28 pm
In American Optical Corporation, Et Al. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 6:54 am
Now serving Orlando, West Palm Beach, Port St. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
What that means is we should unfortunately expect more instances of nursing home abuse in Palm Beach COunty and elsewhere. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 3:22 pm
Ch. 1985): (i) the degree of similarity between the marks, (ii) the similarity of products for which the name is used, (iii) the area and manner of concurrent use, (iv) the degree of care likely to be exercised by consumers, (v) the strength of the plaintiffs’ mark, (vi) whether there has been actual confusion, and (vii) the intent of the alleged infringer to palm off his products as those of another. [read post]
