Search for: "Parent v. State" Results 701 - 720 of 13,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2018, 3:17 am by Family Law
From NCLR: The Supreme Court of the United States announced today that it will not review the decision in McLaughlin v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 3:58 pm by APransky
In this case, the Court recognized that parents have the constitutional right to raise their children without undo interference from the state. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 4:02 am by sally
Mohamed (Azza) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 331; [2012] WLR (D) 92 “The use of the superlative form in the phrase “the most exceptional compassionate circumstances” in paragraph 317(i)(e) of the Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules (1994) stressed how extreme such circumstances had to be in order for an applicant to be granted indefinite leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as the parent or grandparent aged… [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:42 am by admin
Shawn Witte, a Minor, by his next friend and Parent, Teresa Witte, Plaintiff-Appellant, and Teresa Witte, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 2:09 pm by James P. Yudes, Esq.
Recently, we reported on an Appellate Division decision in the case of Bisbing v Bisbing, 445 N.J. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 4:17 am
., §11-604(b) precluded Robey's interpretation because the thrust of the relevant subsection and the surrounding subsections deals exclusively with child defendants or respondents and their parents. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
In yesterday's decisions, the Supreme Court upheld the terminations over claims that the state's actions violated parents' right to the free exercise of religion as well as various other provisions. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 9:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Every state has a set of standards defining child abuse and neglect; the state can intervene to protect the child from a parent who falls below the minimum level of fitness or conduct. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:55 am by Dan Stein
The Supreme Court has decided to review certain elements in United States v. [read post]