Search for: "People v Ball" Results 701 - 720 of 1,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by DaytonDUI
Another area that is affected by the machines built-in assumptions are tests done on people suffering from anemia. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 7:11 am by Josh Camson
That’s what happened in the case of Charm v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 5:57 am
The case was People v Rice, 2007 NY Slip Op 06503 decided by the First Department on August 23. [read post]
4 May 2018, 6:00 am by Doug Cornelius
The SEC has the ball now, and it wants to run with it. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:41 am
That change came about not only because they could become active politically, but also because people came to realize, sometimes to their shock and dismay, that their children, their neighbors, their friends, their co-workers were gays and lesbians ... [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 12:16 pm by Sandy Levinson
” If one were writing a latter-day Gilbert and Sullivan ditty about "people who would not be missed," Norquist would surely be a strong candidate to head the list. [read post]
3 May 2016, 4:12 am by SHG
This goes to the same trade-off reflected by the U.S. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 3:51 am by SHG
**The bill includes the following: (6) In Bearden v. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 6:23 am by Editor Charlie
”  One might also ask if the egg lobbists wore “V” style “Guy Fawkes” masks. [read post]
19 May 2011, 12:45 pm by Scott Nelson
Collusive class settlements allow corporations (when they can find class action lawyers who are willing to play ball with them) to cut off the claims of large numbers of people for a fraction of their real value. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 7:46 pm by Rick
s proposed limitations on amounts people can own or cultivate impact current medical marijuana laws? [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:50 pm
Courts have played an important role in calling "balls and strikes" in evaluating the fairness of arbitration clauses, and many corporations have cleaned up their act and eliminated the most egregiously unfair provisions to avoid having their contracts invalidated. [read post]