Search for: "People v Bright"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,217
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
Instead, the court gave the non-paternity its clear, bright-line intent, an approach for which it found support in a very similar case in California, Jhordan C. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
To the Justices’ frustration, however, Solicitor Dreeben was unable to provide a bright-line rule to cabin his theory. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 5:34 pm
The test, however, is nothing new — it’s based on the 1977 decision by 8th Circuit in Green v Missouri Pacific Railroad. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm
Bond v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 9:57 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
As Mr Eadie points out, that is inevitably the case when policy is cast in broad terms, and it is well established that ‘bright line’ rules are necessarily to some degree arbitrary but that does not render them disproportionate. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:47 pm
As Mr Eadie points out, that is inevitably the case when policy is cast in broad terms, and it is well established that ‘bright line’ rules are necessarily to some degree arbitrary but that does not render them disproportionate. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 2:59 pm
Did he come up with the ‘bright idea’ of appointing Chris Grayling as Lord Chancellor after his evening out? [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am
The landlord can give a counter-notice disputing the RTM company’s entitlement: s.84 (various other people also can, but in reality it is landlords who do this). [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 9:38 am
The landlord can give a counter-notice disputing the RTM company’s entitlement: s.84 (various other people also can, but in reality it is landlords who do this). [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:48 pm
It's the battle of two very bright people mutually articulating eminently reasonable arguments. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:57 pm
After a series of "twists and turns" that began Tuesday afternoon, the judge declared a mistrial Wednesday in Calcagno v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 11:25 am
He cites what he describes as the “seminal case” of Medinol Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
This is not to say that there are no rules – we have some bright line rules, like novelty, that allow us to determine if patents are valid. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court case of Automobile Workers v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:52 am
This is well within the normal competency of judges and is exactly what the lower court in Lee Optical v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 2:30 pm
The result could be a much worse than expected bright line or, in this case, a bright line formula that could become a ceiling rather than a foundation.Another interesting thing about the article is that it suggests that the initial budget for the AC v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am
This is the text of a Keynote address given by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division at the Law Society’s Family Law Annual Conference ‘The sacred and the secular: religion, culture and the family courts’ on London 29 October 2013 (H/t to Adam Wagner) Only a little over a century ago, in 1905, a judge in a family case could confidently opine that the function of the judges was “to promote virtue and morality and to discourage… [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 1:06 pm
The contract is the last of four awarded to cover the stretch between Sea Bright and Manasquan. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:39 am
The judge noted that notwithstanding this relatively bright-line rule, this Court is reluctant to use it as an absolute bar to [Matot’s] claim. [read post]
