Search for: "People v Harding" Results 701 - 720 of 9,966
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2013, 12:35 am by Mark Summerfield
The Administration provided three main reasons for deflecting the will of the people, which basically boil down to:it is too expensive; it is too dangerous; and it is just not good enough. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 6:55 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
When the money people challenged these restrictions under the First Amendment (on the theory that campaign contributions and spending constitutes political speech), the Supreme Court in Buckley v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 9:41 am
I might be missing some restrictions that affect a comparable number of people, and of course the size of the affected group is often hard to measure. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 8:24 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Many people are understandably focused on how a more originalist approach would influence doctrine (say on Roe v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:56 pm by Gene Killian
 And, as a result, the current litigation climate isn’t so great for corporate officers and directors, the vast majority of whom are decent, hard-working people. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 9:49 am by Eric Goldman
Manheim Township School District * More Teenagers Mistakenly Think “Private” Chat Conversations Will Remain Private–People v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 10:34 am by Matt Cameron
” It’s hard to imagine any other kind of sworn statement produced “for the enforcement of law” that could even begin to raise a serious question as to whether or not it was intended to be “testimonial,” especially one which is intended to conclusively establish a significant element of a given crime.3 It is also telling that Commonwealth v. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am by MBettman
The device was about the size of a pager, was sealed in a magnetic case, and did not need to be hard wired to the van’s electrical systems. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]