Search for: "People v Legall"
Results 701 - 720
of 34,687
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2015, 1:00 am
This case is modeled after the cases of Baxter v Montana and Morris v New Mexico, which established access to aid in dying in those states.Counsel Plaintiffs are represented by Kathryn Tucker, now Executive and Legal Director of the Disability Rights Legal Center; Ms. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 4:25 pm
Of course, you can also use the Comment feature to let people know what you think about the possible application of this federal preemption legal doctrine to drug injury lawsuits -- the issue that is before our Supreme Court in the Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
Check back next week for my follow-up post, “The Software Code of Law: Lawyers v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:00 am
Following these events, a lengthy political and legal dispute arose. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 2:09 pm
[ii] People v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 6:15 am
In State v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
In State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm
Representation of the People (Equal Franchise) Act 1928Mari Takayanagi (Parliamentary Archives, UK)23. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 8:28 am
Liebensohn v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 1:11 pm
Trinity Western University v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 12:14 pm
Releases and waivers of liability are so commonplace these days that many people sign them without even stopping to consider the consequences. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 7:48 am
The Legal Theory Bookworm Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress--and a Plan to Stop It by Lawrence Lessig on SSRN. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:03 am
Hodges, 576 U.S. ___ (2015), there are some people who do NOT live in Vermont (the first state where civil unions were legalized by statute) who may wonder whether, where and how to dissolve... [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 5:59 pm
Proposition One: The problem isn't legal v. illegal. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 8:23 am
Daniel Woislaw (Pacific Legal Foundation) has posted California's Fourth Amendment Soup: The Parole Search Exception After People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:31 pm
People v W 2018 NY Slip Op 07926 The court states that pursuant to PL170.10 a sporting event ticket carries with it a legal right, obligation, interest or status. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 8:21 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
Nothing's "legally" wrong with what transpired.But I think the process is far from optimal. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:37 pm
Then the opinion continues with some legal analysis. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:58 pm
Which is why even trained lawyers like the prosecutor and defense counsel disagree on what it says.But the trial judge simply reads the instruction to the jurors and lets these legally untrained folk figure out for themselves what even two lawyers and a judge couldn't resolve.At which point the Court of Appeal typically says: "Well, we presume the jury followed the properly given instructions. [read post]
