Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2010, 3:24 pm
Both Husband and Dixon had found that, given Harrow LBC v Qazi [2004] 1 AC, unless the House of Lords/Supreme Court took a different view, the rule in Monk was not arguably incompatible with Article 8. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
It raises the question, which equity forces us to ask, as to why people do things. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:12 am
It raises the question, which equity forces us to ask, as to why people do things. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 7:15 am
Lord v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Lord & Taylor, LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:09 am
Foskett J observed that no feature of the Strasbourg jurisprudence has gone so far as to impose the kind of obligation contended for in this case and that it is not open to the domestic courts to move ahead of the European Court of Human Rights in this regard (invoking the principle in R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator [2004] 2 AC 323), a principle which has found further expression in Regina (Al-Skeini and others) v Secretary of State for Defence [2008] 1 AC 153 (see in… [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 8:38 pm
Chandler v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:37 am
The Evening Standard expresses the view that judges can be removed by The Lord Chief Justice “if their conduct is seen to be putting the reputation of the judiciary at risk. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 4:05 pm
The contrast with the cool and measured approach (unlike, it is accepted, this post) of Lords Kerr and Wilson in their minority judgment is notable. [read post]
23 May 2009, 7:51 am
Let's go back to 1895 and the Supreme Court decision in Coffin v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:00 am
We do not live in a society where all the people share uniform religious beliefs. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 7:01 am
The 1995 Act was enacted to provide remedies for disabled people at the receiving end of unlawful discrimination. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:19 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
X v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm
With human health at the apex of this system, the assessment of the measures adopted to secure any of these aims is not, as Lord Steyn suggested in R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532, a ”one size fits all” test. [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:14 am
CTB -v- Twitter, Inc. and Persons Unknown (Case No. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 4:45 pm
Scotland now has four IP judges: Lord Emslie, Lady Smith, Lord Hodge and Lord Malcolm. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:43 am
Hearing arguments on the Stolen Valor Act, the justices discussed wartime bravery, high school diplomas and lies people tell on dates. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 2:24 am
In Goldstone v Goldstone & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 39 Lord Justice Thorpe quoted Hedley J in the court below, who had "summarised the litigation in vivid language" thus (at paragraph 42): "1. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:10 am
The IPKat has reported a few times on the attention-riveting case of Resolution v Lundbeck. [read post]
