Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2015, 1:00 am
Lord Sumption again placed weight on the Virgós-Schmit Report. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:55 am
And I guess a more articulate way of thinking about it is that Brady v. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 4:27 am
The House of Lords agreed. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:14 pm
Once again, we would like to thank all our readers and the many people who have contributed to the success of the blog over this period and particularly the large number of people who have written for us over the past 5 years. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In the case of Pham (formerly “B2”), Lord Neuberger PSC, Lady Hale DPSC and Lord Mance, Lord Wilson, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Carnwath JJSC unanimously dismissed the suspected terrorist’s appeal. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 2:36 pm
See A and B v Rotherham MBC [2014] EWFC 47 Fam. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:52 am
The appeal was heard, and unanimously dismissed, by a panel of five Supreme Court justices comprising Lord Neuberger, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge. [read post]
25 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
The foregoing does not mean that “access must be limited to the data of people suspected to have committed serious crime” (at [94]). [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am
Jurisdictional Boundaries of Prior Use within Britain: An analysis of the House of Lords’ judgments in Roebuck v Stirling (1774) and Brown v Annandale (1842)Barbara Henry (University of Hertfordshire)Commentator | Eva Hemmungs Wirtén (Linköping University, Sweden) Two cases, 60 years apart. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
Original Supreme Court decision However, the House of Lords allowed the appeal by a majority of 3 to 2 in R (Bancoult) v Foreign Secretary (No 2) [2008] UKHL 61. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
The claim follows the Federal Government’s loss of a hard drive concerning personal information about 583,000 people. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 4:43 pm
He also claimed that leaflets published and distributed by police on 16 August 2010 which again contained CCTV images of young people involved in rioting identified the appellant”. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
This was exacerbated by the fact that Amazon did not attempt to prevent any confusion by making it clear to people searching for “MTM Special Ops” products that it did not sell them. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
Lord Kerr (for the minority) noted that REP was the “touchstone” of private life (applying Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
Lord Kerr (for the minority) noted that REP was the “touchstone” of private life (applying Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 6:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 6:40 am
This morning, people in coffee houses and churches across the land will no doubt be talking about the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:19 pm
In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:24 pm
With its decision in King v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 1:25 pm
I have to say that, at the risk of being controversial, Westminster’s arguments are absolutely in line with the House of Lords judgment in Ahmad v Newham LBC and that they were not successful in this case demonstrates what I think is becoming a little clearer, that (a) the lower courts are subtly narrowing that judgment, and (b) it may well take another UKSC decision to give clarity. [read post]
