Search for: "People v Person"
Results 701 - 720
of 31,530
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2008, 8:11 am
A recent Illinois Appellate Court case from the Fourth District, People v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 8:23 am
Daniel Woislaw (Pacific Legal Foundation) has posted California's Fourth Amendment Soup: The Parole Search Exception After People v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 5:50 am
People v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:13 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 10:51 am
Elektra v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm
Epton; People v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 8:18 am
In Roberts v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
However, in coming to this ruling, Judge Leon distinguishes the 1979 decision, Smith v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:06 pm
Even the best medical science can't necessarily predict how long someone with metastatic prostate cancer is going to live.Second, on a personal note: Today, the California appellate courts issued not one, not two, not three, but rather fourteen separate published opinions. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:28 pm
To deter, it shouldn't matter much whether a person (or other vehicle) happens to get hit. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 3:26 pm
For example, you can't be charged with attempting to commit an assault with a deadly weapon since the underlying crime of assault is statutorily defined as an "unlawful attempt, coupled with a present ability[,] to commit a violent injury on the person of another" (emphasis added). [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:47 pm
But doing that same thing might also count as a felony -- as "false personation". [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:35 pm
(a)) (count 1); grand theft of personal property (§ 487, subd. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 1:22 pm
And, perhaps, why (in part) he became the person he eventually became.The one we sentence to death. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 11:22 am
To “fuck with you” (abbreviated “fwu”) means to be in a pimp-prostitute relationship with the other person. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:43 pm
But I think it's a tough question how far the police are able to go when all they have on you is that you're carrying a personal amount of weed, which may well be -- and in the vast majority of case, is (I suspect) -- legal under California law. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 11:15 am
Now, personally, once the guy fires a warning shot, any reluctance to part with my wallet would be gone. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 2:20 pm
This was a case in which the police officers were already staking out the relevant location when the shots were fired and an officer testified that he personally saw the shooter fire the weapon. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:04 pm
Doing this job -- or at least writing this blog -- you get used to various personalities and institutions in the Court of Appeal. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:37 pm
Go ahead and picture the person and the relevant tools.Did you picture a 70-year old grandmother? [read post]
