Search for: "People v Quick"
Results 701 - 720
of 2,540
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2008, 6:06 am
The basic process for assessing expert testimony within a motion to exclude a given expert's testimony was laid out by the Court in Daubert v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:28 am
Many years ago (in the 1960s) one or more people, including one Frank Petrella, wrote a screenplay about the boxer Jake LaMotta. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:45 am
O..V..E..R. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:58 pm
I’m very interested to hear more about this challenge if anybody knows details.The other challenge that springs to mind is based upon Burnip v Birmingham CC, Trengove v Walsall MBC, and Gorry v Wiltshire C [2012] EWCA Civ 629 (Our report here). [read post]
11 May 2022, 11:32 am
There are some things we don’t know about the leaked Supreme Court opinion in Dobbs v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:00 am
In Southern Pioneer Life Insurance Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 5:53 pm
In Wooley v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 12:20 pm
Then Buffy v. [read post]
The court must consider the national security and public safety threats posed by concealable weapons
30 Oct 2021, 12:26 pm
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:40 am
Caifornia and United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:33 pm
* Advocate General's opinion in the EU keyword advertising case of Interflora v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:30 pm
Glauser v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 10:07 am
[F]or the next hour-and-a-half, the jury in the People v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 5:01 am
This might explain why one of the cases the motion cites, State v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:16 am
Should Roe v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:51 am
Berge v. [read post]
24 Aug 2024, 9:39 am
Cunniffe and Smith v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 6:39 am
A quick and easy rule in Garcetti cases is that if the speech grows out of the plaintiff's everyday job duties, it's probably not protected. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:01 am
In McCormick v. [read post]
