Search for: "People v. Grant"
Results 701 - 720
of 15,340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2024, 6:34 am
The case is Family Equality v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
This morning, the Supreme Court granted stays of two district court preliminary injunctions in Trump v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
NGN is entitled to publish articles criticising people in the public eye. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 8:51 am
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:18 am
In People v. [read post]
9 Dec 2006, 4:41 pm
Alexander V. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 2:00 am
In Rucho v Common Cause, 588 U.S. ____ (2019), the U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:29 am
In People v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am
Yesterday the Court (with Justice Kagan recused) granted cert. in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am
Coverage of the Supreme Court focused heavily on Monday’s cert. grant in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 11:56 pm
The Court explained that "we have held that 'a defendant who does not rest after the court fails to grant a motion to dismiss at the close of the People's case, proceeds with the risk that he will inadvertently supply a deficiency in the people's case.' Thus, a defendant who presents evidence after a court has declined to grant a trial motion to dismiss made at the close of the People's case waives subsequent review of that… [read post]
30 May 2009, 8:41 pm
People v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 6:54 am
The Supreme Court granted cert in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:24 am
Abarca (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 475, 481–482, review granted October 19, 2016, S237106 [same]; People v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 7:21 am
For these reasons, the court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 7:51 am
Trial court disagreed and declined to grant the motion for a new trial. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:47 pm
Ballard v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 1:54 pm
Heng v. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 10:05 am
Here is the abstract.Moody v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this column, I considered the case of Maryland v. [read post]
