Search for: "People v. Kerr"
Results 701 - 720
of 729
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2013, 6:03 pm
The Fourth Amendment does not bar the government’s proposed collection of telephony metadata, she writes, because the production “is squarely controlled by” Smith v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:00 am
The Board contains no women and, apparently, no people of color. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 10:00 am
Among these were 22 in-person classes and tours for 292 people. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:11 am
Reply Brief Filed in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:57 am
The book also offers a reading of Lawrence v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am
For that group of people, whatever their reasons, I cannot and will not try to persuade them otherwise. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Arp, Note: New Jersey Carpenters vacation fund v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 9:43 am
Arp, Note: New Jersey Carpenters vacation fund v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Be sure to read Stewart Baker’s post at Volokh Conspiracy in response to DNI Clapper’s statement, as well as Orin Kerr’s post at the same blog focusing on the legal standard Clapper invoked in his statement—the Terry v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 4:01 am
… V. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:53 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Van Buren v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 1:39 am
" Jay Kerr-Wilson, one of the most successful litigators in the recent cases, was then a counsel with the Canadian Cable Television Association said "people will probably try to use this by analogy to argue digital stuff, but it's not a digital case. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Evan Brown posted a snippet of the Daily Show's wonderful explanation of the Viacom v. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 7:08 am
That was in 1972, when the Tenth Circuit, in Moritz v. [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
Gawker and Sheldon v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:50 pm
: On a similar note, Rick Horowitz writes today about freedom and why that’s not what’s killing people. [read post]
17 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
It can remind us to be better people, to engage in public service and to help others who are not as fortunate. [read post]
15 May 2007, 12:19 pm
(1) On the jurisprudential level, talking about neutrality or the rule of law tends to remind people of the old law vs. politics distinction. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 9:47 am
State v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 1:05 pm
We consider the rule of law a fundamental value in our Canadian legal and constitutional systems; indeed, as the Supreme Court of Canada declared in the Secession Reference the rule of law is “a principle of profound constitutional and political significance” (para. 71) and “[t]he principles of constitutionalism and the rule of law lie at the root of our system of government. [read post]
