Search for: "People v. More" Results 701 - 720 of 48,727
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2007, 2:38 pm
I'd have given him more if I could.But, notwithstanding that sentiment, I think that Justice Johnson is right in dissent. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 12:33 pm
Much more so, for some reason, than a lot of other -- more bloody -- despicable crimes. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 2:29 pm
You make the call.Can I also just make one more practical comment, for any of the more criminally-minded readers out there. [read post]
13 Mar 2007, 12:10 pm
Which is much more than you'd have spent otherwise. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:23 pm
  It's instead that the predicate assumptions, as well as the mode of analysis, is just so obviously antiquated to contemporary, more informed readers. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm by Francisco Macías
  While most people educated in the United States are familiar with Brown, I would like to bring your attention to more arcane cases, with arguably equal significance. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 9:30 am
But I honestly don't see the harm in having a condition that's more narrowly tailored than this one. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
  But I do think she knew it was "wrong" to spit at other people and to kick them in the stomach? [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 3:42 pm
[¶] There are numerous instances of Trever telling Ralph to bend over and open his butt, that he was going to stick it in, and for Ralph to keep it in; and to do it just one more time, over and over; or requesting Ralph to 'suck it' and threaten[ing] to leave him alone if he didn't and even threatening to kill him. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 11:44 am
  Although I do so with more caveats than -- and not nearly as enthusiastically as -- Justice Hollenhorst. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 12:29 pm
 An issue similar to the one the California Court of Appeal is now split.I thought about my father's oft-retold story when I saw that one of the decisions cited by Justice Kriegler was from Virginia, and related to whether a pistol in a handbag counted as being "on one's person" notwithstanding the "saddlebag rule" established by the Virginia Supreme Court long ago.The more things change . . . . [read post]