Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Long)" Results 701 - 720 of 1,133
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2007, 11:32 am
Bailey, 2004 WL 2914320 (Delaware Superior Court 2004). [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 12:59 pm by Robichaud
Another way to categorize is to emphasize proceedings commonly heard in the Provincial Court instead of the Superior Court of Justice.[6] Naturally, there is considerable overlap in the concepts identified below to all levels of court but it is the purpose of this paper to illustrate how the most common forms of wrongful convictions and the reasons thereof are crystallised most at levels short of high-profile offences. 2. [read post]
26 May 2009, 10:08 am
 I have written before that the Supreme Court confirmation process has become, in effect, a game. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 6:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This was no more apparent than the Court’s decision in R. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2009, 10:26 am
CornelioIn a January 7, 2009 decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Cornelio v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 12:33 pm by John Hopkins
A lawsuit has been filed in the Superior Court at Bridgeport in Connecticut, which may well allow for a meaningful hearing of these and many other questions. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am by stevemehta
The Cassidys and their son Daniel subsequently cross-complained against Blix Street for royalties allegedly owing.2 The trial of the case commenced in March of 2006, presided over by Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Lee Edmon. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:35 pm by The Legal Blog
In practice, this means that inferior courts are bound to apply the legal principles set down by superior courts in earlier cases. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:53 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Here are the facts of the case from the decision of the California Supreme Court on direct appeal, People v. [read post]