Search for: "People v. Superior Court (Wells)"
Results 701 - 720
of 1,873
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2017, 10:30 am
District Court for the District of Columbia issued a memorandum opinion and order in the case of Jane Doe 1, et al., v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Jordan Wells, on behalfof Susai Francis, petitioner,vVincent F. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
This could add, likely less than, the six months a Superior Court Justice is allotted to render his or her reasons for decision (before seeking an extension from the Chief Justice). [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:53 pm
These peoples brought their culture and traditions, their problems and disputes as well as their means of settling disputes. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 5:39 pm
See Benefield v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:58 am
Could people put creches in a park and could they erect them in a courthouse? [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 1:17 pm
(Superior Court of San Diego County, No. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 6:34 am
, Seaford Court Estates Ltd v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:59 am
”Unsurprisingly, the court also found superiority. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 1:01 pm
Supreme Court’s June decision in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:44 am
Nonetheless, in People v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
Before his appointment to the Supreme Court in 2002, Justice Ryan served on the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, for more than five years and as a Judge of the Arizona Superior Court in Maricopa County for more than 10 years. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
We reviewed it, and were somewhat taken aback that – after the court in Desiano v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:31 am
Chandler v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:31 am
Superior Court, 705 P.2d 347 (Cal. 1985)(invalidating a contingent fee arrangement in a public nuisance case) with San Francisco v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
Supreme Court held in Lefkowitz v Turley, 414 US 70, when a public employee is compelled to answer questions or face removal if he or she refuses to do so, the responses are cloaked with immunity automatically, and neither the compelled statements nor their fruits may be used against the employee in a subsequent criminal prosecution.Other decisions addressing the issue of requiring an individual to answer "job-related" question include Garner v Broderick, 392 US… [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Supreme Court explained in Campbell v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:00 am
Georgia Courts continue to recognize this evidentiary burden as seen most recently in Custer v. [read post]
