Search for: "People v. Tooks"
Results 701 - 720
of 11,090
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:13 am
Introduction On 13 May 2020, the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of R v Adams (Appellant) (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 19. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:43 am
People v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:43 am
People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
United States, in Trump v. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 2:20 pm
Gaines v. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:53 am
People v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:48 am
Louisiana.The high court also took up the case of Kansas v. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 7:00 am
Such was the case in Carie v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 1:01 am
Kennedy, the US Supreme Court in Lawrence v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:00 am
Such was the case in Carie v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:50 pm
- Wyeth v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
The Italian legal proceedings Between 1966 and 1970, a first set of criminal proceedings took place in Italy, as the people suspected of having received and handled Victorious Youth faced accusations of fencing cultural property that belonged to the State.[11] The defendants were acquitted, due to a lack of evidence that Victorious Youth even existed (let alone that it was found in Italian waters). [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:00 am
I appreciate and sympathize with the anger many people feel about the decision, and I wish the Court’s decision had gone the other way. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 6:38 am
Vejdeland and others v. [read post]
25 Apr 2021, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court decision Brady v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:04 am
“This court is very concerned about the disparate impact automobile stops have on persons of color and the national statistics on the fatalities suffered by such communities at the hands of police officers,” wrote Justice Cypher in a fractured plurality opinion for the Supreme Judicial Court in Commonwealth v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 8:29 pm
In the appropriately named Liberty v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 4:12 pm
In Berliner v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 6:13 am
Under these circumstances, when the time period charged, namely seven months, approaches the nine-month period found to be per se unreasonable in People v Beauchamp (74 NY2d 639; see People v Sedlock, 8 NY3d at 538), the People are subjected to "proportionally heightened scrutiny" as to whether their inability to provide more precise times is justified (id at 539). [read post]
