Search for: "People v. Way" Results 701 - 720 of 31,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
We don't mind people saying we're full of it, we couldn't be litigators if we did, but that should be decided on the strength of our arguments, not on which side of the "v" we reside. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 1:00 pm
The plaintiffs say that even though the cigarettes are different, they are really just as deadly, because of the way that people smoke them. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 4:23 am
But I think that what has gotten me where I am today is the attitude of optimisim v pessimism. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
Stinchcombe 1991 CanLII 45 (SCC); and, R. v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:49 pm
It's neat to see a case that involves a family bank that was opened way back in 1889 and involves a fight about who currently gets to have control of the bank pursuant to a series of wills from people with the last name of Sefton. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 12:32 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
”  But sometimes Marks is difficult to apply; Baze v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:00 am
I appreciate and sympathize with the anger many people feel about the decision, and I wish the Court’s decision had gone the other way. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 5:16 am by INFORRM
 There are millions of people on three continents who oppose him. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
  The facts of Y are slightly different than X, but the logic and rationale of X fairly clearly dictates that Y be decided the same way. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 1:40 pm
"  That's what being a member of a society is all about.Cases like this one, however, push me the other way. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:09 pm by Elliot Harmon
As Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in Matel v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 8:35 am by dferriero
This series of acknowledgements is a simple way to offer our recognition and respect to the people  who once lived on these lands. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 1:07 pm
One way to look at this is to say that there's zero reason to enforce the offer in such settings, since the case is over anyway and letting people do this only discourages settlement since they can wait until after the MSJ hearing to decide whether to accept the offer or not.The other way to look at this is to think that the defendant is being a moron, so gets what it deserves. [read post]