Search for: "Petition for Review" Results 701 - 720 of 32,729
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2013, 3:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
After receiving three separate petitions for review, including petitions from real parties Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and the City of Sonora, the California Supreme Court voted unanimously on February 13, 2013 to grant review of the Fifth District’s controversial decision in Tuolomne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 4:50 am by Erin Miller
The Court has re-listed the following cases from previous editions of Petitions to Watch for the conference of April 2. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 9:00 am
This week I'll review a small sample of Petition Decisions for a Request for Republication. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:29 am by Haley Proctor
FERC, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Sierra Club petitioned the Court to review FERC’s decision approving a project to construct liquified natural gas facilities in Alaska’s North Slope. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 3:39 pm
The USPTO today filed a petition for a writ of certiorari (here) to the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm by John Ehrett
In its Conference of June 4, 2015, the Court is considering petitions seeking review of issues such as the constitutionality of the University of Texas at Austin’s consideration of race in its undergraduate admissions process, a possible cap on filing fees for prisoners filing multiple in forma pauperis petitions, and the ability of Indian tribal courts to adjudicate civil tort claims against nonmembers. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 2:08 pm by Steven G. Pearl
On October 13, the California Supreme Court granted the plaintiffs' petition for review in Faulkinbury v. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:00 am by Maureen Johnston
This edition of “Petitions to watch” features petitions raising issues that Tom has determined to have a reasonable chance of being granted, although we post them here without consideration of whether they present appropriate vehicles in which to decide those issues. [read post]
19 May 2014, 7:45 pm by Maureen Johnston
At its Conference on May 22, 2014, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the validity of an Alabama redistricting plan under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the scope of an anti-retaliation provision under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and the standard to determine a “true threat” under the First Amendment. [read post]
18 May 2020, 9:08 am by John B. Palley
Now that we have a hard target date we can finish up the final petition and basically have it 99.9% done and, often, let our client review it now. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 6:28 am by Maureen Johnston
At its Conference on April 24, 2015, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as retaliation for speech and association protected by the First Amendment, the use of a firearm and handcuffs during an investigative stop, and the filing period for a constructive discharge claim under federal employment discrimination law. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 5:00 am by Kellie N. Lego
  For more information, please review the USCIS Bulletin: Listening Session: Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers    To Register for this webinar:  Continue reading [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 8:19 am by Dennis Crouch
Government is not a “person” capable of petitioning for institution of AIA review proceedings. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 6:57 pm by Howard Bashman
Supreme Court still reviewing Indiana’s abortion petition”: Marilyn Odendahl of The Indiana Lawyer has this report. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 8:34 am by Alan Brackett
Saltchuk-Young Brothers, No. 17-70415 (March 4, 2019), the court affirmed a decision of the Benefits Review Board, which in turn had affirmed Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Richard M. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:43 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
The petition of the day is: SAP America, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 7:15 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:11 pm by Maureen Johnston
The petition of the day is: Runyon v. [read post]