Search for: "Poole v. United States" Results 701 - 720 of 1,443
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
It calls for an 80-unit “urban living” apartment building, two 12-unit townhouse buildings with integrated parking garages, a clubhouse with common areas and a fitness room, and an outdoor pool…. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 1:39 pm by Daniel Robertson
Daniels of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied the majority of claims in U.S. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 1:36 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
But, instead of complying with the original offset obligations, Samson asked Hooks to amend the Jefferson County Lease in 2001 to pool into a unit associated with the new well. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 5:04 pm by Amy Ross
Avakian also discussed the impact of the Second Circuit’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 10:20 pm
Here’s an interesting new case on the scope of cell phone warrants: United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:14 pm by Dean Freeman
Throughout the many phases of litigation and up until the eve of trial, defendants all presented a united front, pooling their resources, tapping the same expert witnesses and making sure none placed blame on the others. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 12:30 pm by Andy Wang
United States, a Supreme Court case cited in defense papers which said, among other things, “[J]ustice must satisfy the appearance of justice. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 2:49 pm
Paul (1969) held that this term includes “recreational areas” and not just places for spectators to watch events (as in the theaters, concert halls, and stadiums that are listed in the same subsection); United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 4:31 am by Kevin LaCroix
It has now been confirmed that two companies in the United States have potentially been the subject of cyber-terrorism. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm by nedaj
Advisers registered in other states should consult with legal counsel about those states’ custody requirements. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 3:34 pm
United States, 561 U.S. 358, 370, 383 (2010) (crediting that “the facts of the case were ‘neither heinous nor sensational’” and there was “[n]o evidence of the smoking-gun” of his guilt); United States v. [read post]