Search for: "Precision Medical, Inc." Results 701 - 720 of 866
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2010, 2:16 pm by David Walk
” Using terms like “median” and “interquartile” sure makes this all sound precise and scientific, doesn’t it? [read post]
20 May 2010, 6:48 pm by Director
To be medically precise, using the fifth edition of the American Medical Association's Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, (AMA Guide):   An impairment is “an alteration of an individual's health status, a deviation from normal in a body part or organ system and its functioning. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 am by Steve McConnell
The case of Ridgeway v Pfizer, Inc., No. 09-2794 (E.D. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm by Bexis
NSF was first described in the medical literature in 2000. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:53 am by emp
We hope you will find these precisions satisfactory, and we invite you to maintain your interest in Unani. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:28 am
  The Illinois Supreme Court held that Provena Medical Center in Urbana does not provide enough charity care to qualify for the tax exemption provided for hospitals that care for uninsured and poor patients without generating a profit or collecting fees.[1]  The decision has generated significant criticism for relying on old precedent, failing to take into account current economic conditions, and for failing to provide clear guidelines for nonprofit hospitals that want to qualify… [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm by NL
The precise circumstances of the precedent cases were not in themselves set conditions. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm by NL
The precise circumstances of the precedent cases were not in themselves set conditions. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  Even if President Obama’s nominee shared Stevens’ views precisely and thus caused no immediate shift in the Court’s jurisprudence, later retirements and appointments – in particular, the replacement of a conservative by a liberal in a second Obama term – could make the nominee to the “Stevens seat” extremely important. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 1:09 pm
In the absence of any allegations of concerned activity between the hospitals' two DME providers, the only theory that could possibly support the claims was one based on shared monopoly, which was not recognized as a viable cause of action, the court explained.The decision—Precision CPAP, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 6:11 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Marshall, says "An insurer's breach of its contractual promise to pay future medical benefits was precisely the sort of conduct forbidden by Texas Business & Commerce Code, Section 17.46(b)(5), which prohibits misrepresenting "benefits. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 1:47 pm by Bexis
  Only if we've got a really powerful defense, like preemption in In re Medtronic, Inc. [read post]