Search for: "Queen v. Queen"
Results 701 - 720
of 4,482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2019, 1:26 am
Research and Resources The Road to Responsibilities: New Attitudes Towards Internet Intermediaries, Daithi Mac Sithigh, Queen’s University Belfast – School of Law. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:58 pm
The Court then used the factors from R. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:30 pm
Catherine’s Milling and Lumber Company v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Bush v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm
Ben Stokes v The Sun: gross intrusion or simple reportage? [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:00 pm
This could not be said about Kelly v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
” A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 AC 68, Lord Bingham. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
– Daren Heyland, MD Professor of Medicine Queen’s University __________________ References [i] https://www.cihi.ca/en/hospital-stays-in-canada ; last accessed September 19, 2019. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm
The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:17 am
This was not a normal prorogation in the run-up to a Queen’s Speech. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:20 am
II”, Liverpool Mail, February 13, 1864, p. 5.[2] 686 Kelly v Sherlock, Queen's Bench Division, 13 June 1866, (1865-66) L.R. 1 Q.B. 686. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 7:18 pm
It will presumably start at 9:30 AM on Monday, September 23, 2019 at the Federal Court at 180 Queen St. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Notes that the Public Law Project will not be making oral submissions, but says these are important submissions. 1200: Michael Fordham QC says the closest case we have is Bobb & Anor v Manning (Trinidad & Tobago) [2006] UKPC 22 (25 April 2006). 11:55: Michael Fordham QC submits it is accepted prerogative power has to be exercised in the public interest. 11:48: Michael Fordham QC queries whether there is some magic for prerogative powers. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
Lord Keen QC does not agree. 14:42: Lord Keen QC says the example shows the proroguing of Parliament was in fact where the Government did not have support of the House rather than for a King’s/Queens speech. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 9:43 am
One example of this is in J.I.R.L. v Criminal Injuries Compensation Board, where the Divisional Court reviewed an appeal of a decision by the CICB in relation to the quantum of his claim. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
Once on 21 December 2017 at Queen Street Cardiff and another at the Defence Procurement, Research, Technology and Exportability Exhibition (“the Defence Exhibition”) on 27 March 2018. [read post]
