Search for: "Quick v. United States"
Results 701 - 720
of 2,099
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2016, 6:54 pm
The United Nations by contrast deals with public international legal issues. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 2:49 pm
United States ended in a result readily understandable to the non-technical observer: the convicted sex offender lost. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:32 pm
(The United States Supreme Court has the same problem.) [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:03 pm
Well maybe we're about to find out.Patco Construction Company, Inc. v People's United Bank dba Ocean Bank, no pending in state court in Maine, may tell us just whose fault it really is, besides the cyber criminal of course.Patco was a long time customer of the bank but after losing hundreds of thousands of dollars from online theft and then getting a notice from the bank that they wanted Patco to pay it back, they decided they had enough. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 8:06 am
Uploading a video to YouTube's California servers from Canada can constitute infringement in the United States. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 2:45 pm
On August 23, 1995, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (Lifland, J.) confirmed a Plan of Reorganization ("the Plan") and appointed Bankruptcy Services, Inc. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:04 am
In Larimer v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:35 am
United States, which raises the question of whether Padilla v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:43 am
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks | BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan. [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:09 am
The district court agreed with the United States that § 7(a) of the MCA purported to deprive the court of jurisdiction, but held that this section could not constitutionally be applied to deprive the court of jurisdiction under the Supreme Court’s test articulated in Boumediene v. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:50 am
United States seems challenging if one focuses primarily on Congress’ intent and policy goals when enacting 18 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 11:24 am
All of xHamster's servers are located outside of the United States. [read post]
26 Nov 2006, 2:43 pm
They contend that conclusory allegations cannot simply be ignored, as suggested by petitioners and the United States, because the distinction between factual allegations and conclusions of the pleader was previously rejected by the Court in United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
Amazon's trade mark travails in the USThe doctrine of initial interest confusion [Mr Justice Arnold was in favour here and here; "no, no, no" said the Court of Appeal for England and Wales] is a fascinating doctrine that is of great potential value to trade mark-owning litigants in the United States, where it is still alive and kicking. [read post]
5 Oct 2019, 1:01 pm
To Schmidt’s knowledge, this is the “first time in state history” that Kansas has argued three Supreme Court cases in a single term, and “certainly in such quick succession. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 11:56 am
UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION;UNITED STATES STEEL AND CARNEGIE PENSION FUNDNo. 10-4475UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT2011 U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:30 pm
Unite Here Local 355 and Unite Here Local 355 v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 3:12 pm
Obduskey then petitioned the United States Supreme Court for certiorari (an order by which a higher court reviews a decision of a lower court).Applicable LawTo better understand the Obduskey decision, a quick primer on nonjudicial foreclosures and the Act is in order.Nonjudicial foreclosure. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 10:51 am
And the United States Supreme Court will now determine whether it is permissible. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 6:49 am
And the United States Supreme Court will now determine whether it is permissible. [read post]
