Search for: "R. R. D. v. Holder"
Results 701 - 720
of 904
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm
John Reed Stark Earlier this week, media reports circulated that this past spring Google had exposed the private data of thousands of the Google+ social network users and then opted not to disclose the issue, in part because of concerns that doing so would draw regulatory scrutiny and cause reputational damage. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
John Reed Stark As I noted in a post at the time, on February 20, 2018, the SEC issued its guidance for cybersecurity-related disclosures. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 8:38 pm
This Tuesday, the Mannheim Regional Court gave short shrift to Deutsche Telekom v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
John Reed Stark There have been several very high profile news reports of significant law firm data breaches. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
Michael R. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:29 pm
In a decision captioned Beal bank, SSB v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:52 pm
The Supreme Court opinion is available here: Pineda v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:46 pm
The Supreme Court opinion is available here: Pineda v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am
In R (on the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 56, [2021] All ER (D) 53 (Dec), the Supreme Court found there was no positive obligation on the state to provide the option of an ‘X’ gender category on passports. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:11 pm
Band: Besek brought this up w/r/t Lenz amended opinion; I won’t speculate about why the 9thCircuit removed that line. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Similarly in Pollen v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
Holder, 132 S. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 11:24 am
The FTC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 1:55 pm
For businesses in Illinois (and potentially in states with similar statues), the ruling in Rosenbach v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 3:04 am
Until 2009, each unit-holder nominated one director to the four-member board. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 7:38 am
Thinks about this as a tension that needs balance: pro-TM protection policies v. preserving robust competition in product market and preserving patent/©’s public domain, as well as 1A issues. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:39 am
He said he'd turn this economy around. [read post]
